Teams

RVR

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - ASPEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - ASPEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Makenzie Eshelman
published
3.29
Zoe Herreid
published 3.5
3.24
Katie Karow
published
3.16
Audrey Imhoff
published 3.5
3.14
Yoko Smith Rhodes
published
3.10
Amy Daniel
published 3
3.08
Michelle Bevington
published
2.92
Anne Goldberg
published 3
2.79
Morgan Warth
published
2.75
Karen Fullerton
published
Danielle King
published 3
Patsy Isaacson
published
Suzi Jenkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Imhoff + Michelle Bevington404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Makenzie Eshelman
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Zoe Herreid
45W–18L career · type A · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Katie Karow
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Audrey Imhoff
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Yoko Smith Rhodes
21W–12L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Amy Daniel
30W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
Michelle Bevington
17W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Anne Goldberg
21W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
Morgan Warth
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
Karen Fullerton
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Danielle King
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patsy Isaacson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Suzi Jenkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.