Teams

JCollins

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-10vs NRodriguezWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristine Potter / Holly Santago vs Natalie Rodriguez / Heather Sherwood6-3, 6-1
2022-10-03vs BShaltSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristine Potter / Holly Santago vs CAROLINE FLAMANT / Michele Lagerstedt6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesVickie Gibbs / Julie Helmuth vs Beth Gildea / Ellen Powell0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-12vs ACantandoWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristine Potter / Holly Santago vs Abigail Douek / Julia Hughes6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Grantham / Kenie Wrenn vs Erica Oliver / Jaime Gaskins6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaura Valtin / Vickie Gibbs vs Blair Kennedy / Caroline Ives6-3, 6-1
2022-09-05vs NRodriguezLost 02
L#1 DoublesKenie Wrenn / Holly Santago vs Gabrielle Bohdel / Natalie Rodriguez0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVickie Gibbs / Ashley Grantham vs Alex Davidson / Samantha Taylor4-6, 4-6
2022-09-03vs BShaltSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLusally Hong / Holly Santago vs Michele Lagerstedt / Brianna Shait5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAshley Grantham / Gabriela Flores vs Marlee Helbig / Courtney Phillips3-6, 1-6
2022-08-31vs KLevineSplit 11
W#2 DoublesVickie Gibbs / Lusally Hong vs Kelly Thompson / Stephanie King6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAshley Grantham / Gabriela Flores vs Stephanie Bradley / Jana Inman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-08vs ACantandoWon 10
W#3 DoublesVickie Gibbs / Julie Helmuth vs Kelly Hurter / Jaime Gaskins3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Holly Santago
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Kristine Potter
published 3.5
2.60
Susie Albion
published
2.56
Laura Valtin
published
2.49
Ashley Grantham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.35
Vickie Gibbs
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.25
Lusally Hong
published
Joshua Collins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristine Potter + Holly Santago21469% games+1.3% vs expected
Vickie Gibbs + Ashley Grantham1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Holly Santago
127W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Kristine Potter
146W–70L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
Susie Albion
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.60
Laura Valtin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
2.56
3
Ashley Grantham
36W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.49
2.5
Vickie Gibbs
55W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%88%12%
2.35
Lusally Hong
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.25
Joshua Collins
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.