Teams

UTC - Wheeler

2023 LeeCharlotte Trilevel 18 & Over Summer · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-09vs Seminole Lakes - DomingoWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheri Coleman / Jan Wheeler vs Karen Corliss / Cheryl Domingo7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-08-19vs Vivante - VoylesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatina Colbert / Jane Zito vs Sandy Ritter / Leah Voyles0-6, 6-7
2023-08-12vs Seminole Lakes - DomingoWon 10
W#1 DoublesJane Zito / Sheri Coleman vs Julie Schoettley / Suzy Harrison6-4, 6-0
2023-08-05vs Vivante - VoylesLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheri Coleman / Jane Zito vs Angela Stephens / Leah Voyles4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-07-22vs Paseo - ZimmerWon 10
W#1 DoublesKerry Constantine / Cynthia Sabatino vs Christine Brodsky / Beth Wilke6-2, 6-2
2023-07-15vs Hancock Park - RiccioWon 10
W#1 DoublesPaula Houghton / Katina Colbert vs Victoria Boyd / Kendra Rowe6-0, 6-3
2023-07-08vs Heron's Glen - GregorWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatina Colbert / Cynthia Sabatino vs Lori Vivian / Gayle Kloosterman6-2, 7-5
2023-07-01vs LeeChar/Lansdale/18&OverTriWWon 10
W#1 DoublesKerry Constantine / Katina Colbert vs Diane Crews / Cathy Hysell7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Kim Shotwell
published
3.57
Cynthia Sabatino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Melissa Dorr
published
3.34
Pamella Attuso
published
3.31
Jane Zito
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Janet Choisnet
published
2.95
Mary Lowe
published
Diana Provence
published 3
Jan Wheeler
published
Jodee Siriano
published
Katina Colbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sheri Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Zito + Sheri Coleman21957% gamesnot enough data
Jane Zito + Katina Colbert12361% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Sabatino + Sheri Coleman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Shotwell
19W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.63
4
Cynthia Sabatino
130W–89L career · 2 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Melissa Dorr
25W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
Pamella Attuso
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.34
Jane Zito
186W–105L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Janet Choisnet
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Mary Lowe
21W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Diana Provence
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jan Wheeler
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jodee Siriano
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katina Colbert
186W–92L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheri Coleman
132W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.