← Teams

THPRD-Reese/Ellis

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Nancy Atkins
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.32
Kathleen Budnick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.11
Bernadette Lisac
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Susie Garland
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.04
Ann Cassin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Kerry Sanford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Gina Ariosa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results10 ties
2024-09-14Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesSusie Garland / Jan Funkhouser vs Leslie Hofferd / Darla Farstvedt5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-13Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesSusie Garland / Rebecca Kreag vs Mary Louise Sumioka / Nona Allison6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-11-18Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSandra Ellis / Kerry Sanford vs Patricia Morrison / Holly Guntermann2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGina Ariosa / Susie Garland vs Shirley Derby / Donna Weyand6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Jan Funkhouser vs Christine Hattenhauer / Barbara Pasmore6-2, 6-0
2023-11-12Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKathleen Murrin / Bernadette Lisac vs Laura Shier / Betty Roux6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKathy Briscoe / Gina Ariosa vs Linda Castaneda / Catherine Greenblatt6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Jesse / Kathleen Budnick vs Sarah Robertson / Karen Kraus6-1, 6-1
2023-10-21Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesBernadette Lisac / Kerry Sanford vs Deb Garris / Janae Pyle6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGina Ariosa / Susie Garland vs Julia Hall / Kim Wright6-4, 6-1
2023-10-14Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Mary Jesse vs Gail Bolte / Maritess Mayer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Cassin / Kathleen Murrin vs Pat Kaplan / Anna Boyarshinova6-0, 6-0
2023-10-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesSandra Ellis / Bernadette Lisac vs Angela Benedict / Pamela Minor6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNancy Atkins / Mary Jesse vs Itsuko Day / Ramona Kirsch2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Briscoe / Ann Cassin vs Tamara Phillips / Alana Rhea6-2, 6-3
2023-09-30Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKathleen Murrin / Kerry Sanford vs Cori Pierce / Michele Snyder6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Atkins / Mary Jesse vs Linda Binns / Paula Conway6-4, 6-1
2023-09-24Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesSandra Ellis / Bernadette Lisac vs Jayne Mitchell / Debra Hall6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusie Garland / Jennifer Fei vs Judy Orlandini / Lisa Cohns6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Cassin / Kathy Briscoe vs Jing Li / Molly Walton6-3, 6-0
2023-09-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBernadette Lisac / Kerry Sanford vs Dalika Crawford / Sara Weinstein6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNancy Atkins / Mary Jesse vs Elizabeth Burns / April Paris6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSandra Ellis / Susie Garland vs Kristin Campbell / Barbara Gram3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nancy Atkins
79W–82L career
38%62%0%
3.49
3.5
Kathleen Budnick
138W–170L career
0%98%2%
3.32
3.5
Bernadette Lisac
21W–28L career
12%88%0%
3.11
3.5
Susie Garland
37W–56L career
25%75%0%
3.06
3.5
Ann Cassin
45W–69L career
26%74%0%
3.04
3.5
Kerry Sanford
22W–32L career · type A
40%60%0%
3.00
3
Gina Ariosa
24W–46L career
0%80%20%
2.96

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.