Teams

Da.Russo55M

2024 Capital Mixed 55 & Over · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-31vs Jo.Nance55M3.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDarsan Russo / Peter Russo vs Anne Redmond / Tom Pullara2-6, 1-6
2024-07-17vs Ka.Wahle55MWon 10
W#1 DoublesMelissa Proctor / Matt Vaughn vs Paul Ahaus / Karen Blume6-4, 6-4
2024-07-16vs Jo.Nance55M3.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Zimmerman / Matt Vaughn vs Sharon Kucyk / Mark Moye6-3, 6-0
2024-07-15vs Ka.Wahle55MWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Proctor / Ed Stempien vs George Hallowell / Mary Lewis James3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDarsan Russo / Peter Russo vs Maria Riemann / Neil Riemann6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-10vs Jo.Nance55M3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVickie Dagit / Ed Stempien vs Dawn Johnstone / Billy Usrey1-6, 2-6
2024-06-05vs Ka.Wahle55MSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDan Rea / Melissa Proctor vs Carl Anthony / Karen Blume5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCarol Zimmerman / Ed Stempien vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-31vs Ka.Wahle55MWon 10
W#2 DoublesVickie Dagit / Eddie King vs Maria Riemann / Neil Riemann6-4, 6-1
2024-05-29vs Jo.Nance55M3.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesDebra Vaughn / Matt Vaughn vs Mark Moye / Sharon Kucyk6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDarsan Russo / Ed Stempien vs Dora Reed / Joel Nance6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Matt Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Mark Gentry
published
2.80
Beth Farrell
published 3
2.77
Bruce Farrell
published 3
2.76
Ed Stempien
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Eddie King
published
2.69
Carol Zimmerman
published 3
2.63
Debra Vaughn
published 3
2.52
Vickie Dagit
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.37
Dan Rea
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.13
Darsan Russo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Peter Russo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Farrell + Bruce Farrell5254% games+10.7% vs expected
Debra Vaughn + Matt Vaughn213 matchesnot enough data
Darsan Russo + Peter Russo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Matt Vaughn
71W–94L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
Mark Gentry
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Beth Farrell
14W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Bruce Farrell
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Ed Stempien
32W–75L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
Eddie King
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Carol Zimmerman
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Debra Vaughn
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Vickie Dagit
28W–96L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Dan Rea
36W–100L career · 1 line in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.37
2.5
Darsan Russo
67W–102L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Peter Russo
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.