Teams

Yadkin/Haynes/18 6.5

2025 Yadkin Valley Combo 18 & Over · Women 6.5 - Tuesday Night

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-07vs Yadkin/De Young/18 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Thompson / Katelyn Chapman vs Sarah Eugenia Gallo / Colleen Isaacson7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim Haynes / Deirdre Hjelt vs Hannah Giles / Emily Mustin1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJoAnn White / Kristie Moesner vs Meghan de Young / Jennifer Baker0-6, 1-6
2025-09-30vs Yadkin/Allen-Ray/Old Town/18 6.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesCandace Bowman / Deirdre Hjelt vs Betsey Hutton / Rebecca Reece6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLucie Temple / Sarah Dalena vs Lela Ray / Whitney Newell6-0, 7-5
2025-09-16vs Yadkin/Griggs/18+6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesClarissa Tatum / Deirdre Hjelt vs Torin Liberthson-Brown / Maile Kim6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Kaplan / Candace Bowman vs Delaney Teceno / Chenequa Ceasar6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Hart / Hillary Stevens vs Chanel Griggs / Donna Johnson6-0, 6-3
2025-09-14vs Yadkin/Keller/Westwood/18 6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Kaplan / Kim Haynes vs Alyssa Howards / McKenzie Edwards7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKatelyn Chapman / Lucie Temple vs Julie Long / Sarah Blackwell6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCandace Bowman / Kristie Moesner vs Laura Gregory / Debbie Lord7-5, 6-1
2025-09-09vs Yadkin/Keller/Westwood/18 6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesJoAnn White / Deirdre Hjelt vs McKenzie Edwards / Julie Long6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatie Thompson / Sarah Dalena vs Virginia Pleasants / Carrie Haberkost6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Hart / Hillary Stevens vs Valerie Berger / Sarah Chandler6-2, 6-2
2025-09-02vs Yadkin/De Young/18 6.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesClarissa Tatum / Deirdre Hjelt vs Hannah Giles / Emily Mustin4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Thompson / Katelyn Chapman vs Caroline Gallagher / Colleen Isaacson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoAnn White / Kabler Meyer vs Betsy Harris / Lauren Hylarides7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Yadkin/Allen-Ray/Old Town/18 6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Hart / Katelyn Chapman vs Becca Breeden / Alice Day Clark6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKim Haynes / Kabler Meyer vs Claire Devon / Whitney Newell6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatie Thompson / Sarah Dalena vs Betsey Hutton / Rebecca Reece6-4, 6-3
2025-08-12vs Yadkin/Griggs/18+6.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesClarissa Tatum / Kristie Moesner vs Felice Manget Harvey / Amy Mills6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLucie Temple / Sarah Kaplan vs Donna Johnson / Lindsey Marion6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCandace Bowman / Hillary Stevens vs Amy Starnes / Chenequa Ceasar6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 - Tuesday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Clarissa Tatum
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.36
Lucie Temple
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Katelyn Chapman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
JoAnn White
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Kim Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Sarah Kaplan
published
3.27
Katie Thompson
published
Candace Bowman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Nancy Hart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Kabler Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Hillary Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Sarah Dalena
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Kristie Moesner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Carpenter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucie Temple + Nancy Hart2442% games+2.5% vs expected
Clarissa Tatum + JoAnn White5083% gamesnot enough data
Lucie Temple + Katelyn Chapman404 matchesnot enough data
Candace Bowman + Deirdre Hjelt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Clarissa Tatum
62W–24L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.58
3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Lucie Temple
31W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Katelyn Chapman
53W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
JoAnn White
39W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
Kim Haynes
21W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Sarah Kaplan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Katie Thompson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Candace Bowman
15W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Hart
34W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Kabler Meyer
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.20
3
Hillary Stevens
50W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Sarah Dalena
22W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Kristie Moesner
22W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
Lori Carpenter
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.