Teams

BHS - Alley Cats

2021 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-11vs KeswickLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnita McGinty / Jean Shipman vs Marijo Lecker / Sharon Merrick3-6, 4-6
2021-06-02vs Forest LakesWon 10
W#3 DoublesMargaret Smith / Anita McGinty vs Beth Kohler / Shauna Hogg6-1, 6-2
2021-05-26vs BHSC - HooverLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Overman / Anita McGinty vs Arlene Okun / Mary Wagoner3-6, 1-6
2021-05-19vs ACACLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Kelly Lindauer0-6, 1-6
2021-05-05vs KeswickLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Melissa Zeller0-6, 1-6
2021-04-16vs BHSC - HooverLost 01
L#2 DoublesJean Shipman / Anita McGinty vs Melissa Hoover / Silvia Blemker6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Courtney Heyward
published 3.5
3.16
Julie McCulloch
published
3.11
Anita McGinty
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
2.85
Karen Overman
published
Laura Pietro
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Courtney Heyward
13W–10L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22
Julie McCulloch
8W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%10%90%
3.16
3.5
Anita McGinty
73W–56L career · 11 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
Karen Overman
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
Laura Pietro
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.