Teams

Shaw/18/4.0/MXD/FORS

2026 Monroe Mixed 18 & Over · 4.0 Monroe (18&O) Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.93 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-28vs Johnson/18/4.0/MXD/ForsWon 30
W#1 DoublesAbi Antis / Brooks Anzalone vs Lauren Pleasant / Linh Tuong Nguyen7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnna Shaw / Andrew Philley vs Robert Chappell / Wesley Johnson6-1, 2-0
W#3 DoublesChloe Batterton / Benton Anzalone vs Aaron Coody / Helen Johnson6-4, 6-0
2026-07-25vs Johnson/18/4.0/MXD/ForsWon 30
W#1 DoublesGage Batterton / Clara Cobb vs Wesley Johnson / Thomas Hayes6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrooks Anzalone / Anna Shaw vs Luke Philips / Katie Cracraft7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAbi Antis / Benton Anzalone vs Robert Ransom / Dani Manning2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-06vs Johnson/18/4.0/MXD/ForsLost 12
L#1 DoublesChloe Batterton / Andrew Philley vs Robert Ransom / Kathryn Lawrence0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Shaw / Gage Batterton vs Robert Chappell / Wesley Johnson6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAbi Antis / Benton Anzalone vs Luke Philips / Katie Cracraft2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-07-02vs Johnson/18/4.0/MXD/ForsWon 30
W#1 DoublesAbi Antis / Brooks Anzalone vs Dani Manning / Robert Ransom6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesClara Cobb / Andrew Philley vs Wesley Johnson / Cade Crumley6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnna Shaw / Benton Anzalone vs Helen Johnson / Aaron Coody6-0, 6-0
2026-06-30vs Johnson/18/4.0/MXD/ForsWon 30
W#1 DoublesChloe Batterton / Gage Batterton vs Helen Johnson / Luke Philips7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAnna Shaw / Andrew Philley vs Lauren Pleasant / Linh Tuong Nguyen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesClara Cobb / Brooks Anzalone vs Katie Cracraft / Robert Chappell6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Monroe (18&O) Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Shaw/18/4.0/MXD/FORS41132796
2Johnson/18/4.0/MXD/Fors1421328168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Clara Cobb
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Brooks Anzalone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Benton Anzalone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Abi Antis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Chloe Batterton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Anna Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.43
Andrew Philley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Gage Batterton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clara Cobb
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.96
4
Brooks Anzalone
4W–0L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Benton Anzalone
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Abi Antis
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Chloe Batterton
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Anna Shaw
9W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Andrew Philley
4W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
Gage Batterton
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.