Teams

WAL LUNNINGHAM/GRADY

2023 FW USTA · USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N

14 players · average NTRP 3.70 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for USPTA Adult Fall Ladies N have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Breanna Clary
published 4
3.71
Amy Armfield
published 4
3.44
Spring McCurdy
published
3.42
Joy Narciso
published
3.33
Alice Grady
published 3.5
3.19
Ginger Justice
published 3.5
3.15
Barbara Chonko
published 3.5
3.14
Yvonne McConachie
published
3.10
2.98
Lisa Woody
published
2.91
Jane Schmidt
published
2.78
Jenny Luningham
published
2.60
Ronda Lane
published
Michelle Fagan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Armfield + Breanna Clary8454% games+0.8% vs expected
Barbara Chonko + Alice Grady8453% games−2.7% vs expected
Ginger Justice + Melissa Missy Brignac3842% games−6.9% vs expected
Jane Schmidt + Michelle Fagan4159% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Chonko + Jenny Luningham123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Breanna Clary
20W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Amy Armfield
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Spring McCurdy
7W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Joy Narciso
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Alice Grady
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Ginger Justice
14W–25L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Barbara Chonko
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Yvonne McConachie
17W–32L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
Melissa Missy Brignac
8W–19L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Lisa Woody
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jane Schmidt
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.91
Jenny Luningham
13W–26L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
2.78
Ronda Lane
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.60
Michelle Fagan
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.