Teams

Wissel HCC

2024 Hillsborough Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-20vs Hills/Karpan/55&Over8.0XDLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid King / Marie Teixeira vs Chris Eversole / Janet Karpan2-6, 0-6
2024-10-18vs Hills/Karpan/55&Over8.0XDLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlbert Alhadeff / Leticia Leppert vs Monty Johnson / Laurie Smith4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid King / Marie Teixeira vs Chris Eversole / Janet Karpan1-6, 2-6
2024-09-29vs Hills/Karpan/55&Over8.0XDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJim Stefan / Leticia Leppert vs Sylvie Roy / Paul Zack6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDarin Garner / Marie Teixeira vs Sylvain Gauthier / Elizabeth Burdick6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-22vs Hills/Karpan/55&Over8.0XDLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Mullis / Marie Teixeira vs Sylvie Roy / Paul Zack3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Leticia Leppert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Tish Wissel
published
3.78
Jim Stefan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Albert Alhadeff
published 4
3.76
Barney Bailey
published 4
3.75
Marie Teixeira
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Kelly Armagost
published
3.70
Lynn O'Brien
published
3.65
David Voelker
published 4
3.61
Caralyn Paul
published 4
3.52
Darin Garner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Melissa Voelker
published
Stephen Mullis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Voelker + Leticia Leppert314 matchesnot enough data
David Voelker + Melissa Voelker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Leticia Leppert
211W–99L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.89
Tish Wissel
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%10%
3.83
Jim Stefan
37W–48L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Barney Bailey
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
Marie Teixeira
19W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Kelly Armagost
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
Lynn O'Brien
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
4
David Voelker
109W–90L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Caralyn Paul
289W–165L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Darin Garner
104W–81L career · 1 line in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Melissa Voelker
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
Stephen Mullis
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.