Teams

55 & Over M8.0-CaribbeanTorrimar-Juan Guilbe

Adult 55 & Over 2021 · Adult 55 & Over M8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesGilberto Cuevas / Nelson Diaz vs Angel Ortiz / Miguel Rivera0-2
W#2 DoublesJohnny Mejias / Antonio Faura-Clavell vs Gary Morales / Jose Rivera0-1
2021-09-18vs Manati-Carlos MelendezWon 10
W#2 DoublesNelson Diaz / Johnny Mejias vs Jorge Martinez / Henry Vega Pino6-4, 6-3
2021-09-18vs Manati-Carlos MelendezWon 10
W#2 DoublesAntonio Faura-Clavell / Johnny Mejias vs Henry Vega Pino / Juan Reyes6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesAntonio Faura-Clavell / Gilberto Cuevas vs Angel Ortiz / Ivan Collazo4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over M8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Antonio Faura-Clavell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Enrique Maymi
published 4
Frank Baez
published 4
3.47
Francisco Menendez
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.45
Andres Morrell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Gilberto Cuevas
published 3.5
3.05
Johnny Mejias
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Juan Guilbe
published
Nelson Diaz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Pedro Rivera
published
Roberto Tellechea
published
William Micheo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nelson Diaz + Antonio Faura-Clavell7170% gamesnot enough data
Nelson Diaz + Francisco Menendez4358% gamesnot enough data
Johnny Mejias + Antonio Faura-Clavell3241% gamesnot enough data
Francisco Menendez + Andres Morrell314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Antonio Faura-Clavell
57W–28L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Enrique Maymi
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Frank Baez
6W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Francisco Menendez
51W–31L career · 7 lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Andres Morrell
54W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Gilberto Cuevas
45W–42L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
Johnny Mejias
55W–69L career · 7 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.05
Juan Guilbe
9W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nelson Diaz
40W–29L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Pedro Rivera
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Roberto Tellechea
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
William Micheo
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.