Teams

Westwood - Payne / Hassett

2022 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weeknight Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-07vs Burkwood ClarkLost 01
L#1 DoublesLil Racelis / SanDee Gammon vs Modestine Carter / Virginia Bowie5-7, 1-3
2022-07-18vs TDC CarlyleLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Bearman / Caren Payne vs Diana Dull / Kim Schultz6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2022-07-15vs ACAC LarueWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonna Bearman / Lil Racelis vs Carol Hoefer / Denise Weisberg6-3, 6-4
2022-07-12vs TCRC SchweitzerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesElizabeth West / Caren Payne vs Virginia Grigg / Karen Devalk6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSanDee Gammon / Donna Bearman vs C Suzanne Finley / Melissa Skorupa6-2, 6-1
2022-06-20vs RMC FlowersWon 10
W#2 DoublesCherie Warfield / Donna Bearman vs Kathy Laing / Rhonda McIlwain6-1, 6-3
2022-06-13vs Burkwood SweeneySplit 11
L#1 DoublesLil Racelis / SanDee Gammon vs Catherine Sweeney / Cynthia Muncy2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCherie Warfield / Caren Payne vs Lynne Moore / Teresa Landes-Shuler6-1, 6-2
2022-06-06vs Raintree Bryan / Bullard 7.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesLil Racelis / SanDee Gammon vs Julie Scott / Peggy Bryan6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCaren Payne / Cherie Warfield vs Rebecca Schwartz / Marcia Finsterwald6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Barbara Hassett
published 4
3.57
SanDee Gammon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Donna Bearman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Cherie Warfield
published 3.5
3.25
Elizabeth West
published 3.5
3.22
Lil Racelis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Caren Payne
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Renee Gilman
published
Janet Livick
published
Louise O'Connor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lil Racelis + SanDee Gammon13564% games+7.5% vs expected
SanDee Gammon + Donna Bearman372751% games+1.7% vs expected
Lil Racelis + Donna Bearman191352% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Hassett
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
3.5
SanDee Gammon
123W–74L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Donna Bearman
137W–92L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Cherie Warfield
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Elizabeth West
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Lil Racelis
116W–94L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Caren Payne
111W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
Renee Gilman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Janet Livick
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Louise O'Connor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.