Teams

Smith/Rogers/MRC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-04vs Divakaruni/Bentonville/KTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGraham Gudis / Derrick Johnson vs Jean-Francois Meullenet / Azarudeen Jahir Hussain3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDrew Smith / Jacob Cockrell vs Shashikanth Divakaruni / SIVA SANKAR BACHANABOYANA4-6, 3-6
2025-02-12vs Cockrell/Bentonville/MRCLost 12
W#1 SinglesMatthew Frail vs Matthew Hugen6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesCory Greenhaw vs Jacob Cockrell2-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesChad Bell vs Joseph Jenson3-6, 4-6
2025-02-11vs Patterson/Bentonville/MRCWon 21
L#1 SinglesSTEFANO ROSSO vs Pablo Ivan Lara Zepeda3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDrew Smith vs Frederick Hudspeth7-6, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMatthew Frail vs Keith Landrum4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-06vs Cockrell/Bentonville/MRCLost 12
L#1 SinglesDrew Smith vs Nicolas Cuadros3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMatthew Frail vs Matthew Hugen5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCory Greenhaw vs Brian Cosey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-26vs Divakaruni/Bentonville/KTCWon 21
L#1 SinglesSTEFANO ROSSO vs SIVA SANKAR BACHANABOYANA4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesGraham Gudis vs Sindhoor Velaga6-4, 6-0
W#3 SinglesDrew Smith vs Shashikanth Divakaruni5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-01-06vs Little/Rogers/SVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesCory Greenhaw vs Jackson Arbeitman1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Frail vs David Little4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesChad Bell vs Carlos Silva2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Graham Gudis
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
Drew Smith
usually #3 Singles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Chad Bell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Cory Greenhaw
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
STEFANO ROSSO
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Matthew Frail
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Graham Gudis
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Drew Smith
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Chad Bell
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cory Greenhaw
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
STEFANO ROSSO
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Matthew Frail
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.