Teams

Midtown/Oppenheimer

2026 Broward Adult 40 & Over Day · 2.5 Adult Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-23vs HeronBay/BanhamWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmalia Valdes / Daniela Sanz vs Amanda Steely / Anabella Bhatti3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDaniela Cabezas vs Cheryl Banham6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Hird Matthew / Maria Martinez vs Catalina Salcedo / Monica Bermudez6-3, 6-1
2026-03-16vs Broward/BarrazaSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDaniela Cabezas vs Yiwen Fan6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaylin Cusco / Maria Martinez vs Caty Turner / Damaris Mendoza3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-03-02vs HeronBay/BanhamWon 21
W#1 DoublesKim Oppenheimer / Lorena Esclair vs Catalina Salcedo / alejandra torek6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDaniela Cabezas vs Odyssa Billings4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmalia Valdes / Donna Hird Matthew vs Amanda Steely / Catherine Peers1-6, 3-6
2026-02-23vs Broward/BarrazaLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Ballesteros / Maria Martinez vs Monica Clinton / Caty Turner7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGeraldina Bidegain vs Melissa Clements1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDaniela Cabezas / Maylin Cusco vs Damaris Mendoza / Rana Zaki6-2, 6-3
2026-02-09vs HeronBay/BanhamWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmalia Valdes / Claudia Low vs Amanda Steely / Linda Restrepo4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGeraldina Bidegain vs Cheryl Banham6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMaria Martinez / Kim Oppenheimer vs Odyssa Billings / alejandra torek2-6, 3-6
2026-01-26vs Broward/BarrazaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlejandra Jaramillo / Patricia Ballesteros vs Monica Clinton / Yorixela Hurtado2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMaylin Cusco vs Yiwen Fan2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDaniela Sanz / Amalia Valdes vs Caty Turner / Melissa Clements3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-01-19vs HeronBay/BanhamLost 12
L#1 DoublesSonia Maranto / Lorena Esclair vs alejandra torek / Magally Bruce3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesClaudia Low vs Linda Restrepo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniela Sanz / Amalia Valdes vs Monica Bermudez / Catalina Salcedo6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2026-01-05vs Broward/BarrazaLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia Ballesteros / Sonia Maranto vs Jona Moreno / Caty Turner6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKim Oppenheimer vs Claudia Palazzi0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLorena Esclair / Daniela Sanz vs Yamila Fernandez Barraza / Lucila Valenzuela4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Maria Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.35
Patricia Ballesteros
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Lorena Esclair
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.31
Maylin Cusco
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.30
Daniela Sanz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.30
Daniela Cabezas
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.25
Claudia Low
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.23
Geraldina Bidegain
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.23
Amalia Valdes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.16
Sonia Maranto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.14
Alejandra Jaramillo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Kim Oppenheimer
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.06
Donna Hird Matthew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amalia Valdes + Daniela Sanz4259% games+7.9% vs expected
Maria Martinez + Patricia Ballesteros224 matchesnot enough data
Maria Martinez + Lorena Esclair213 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Ballesteros + Sonia Maranto213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Martinez
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.37
Patricia Ballesteros
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Lorena Esclair
17W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
Maylin Cusco
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Daniela Sanz
7W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Daniela Cabezas
5W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Claudia Low
24W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Geraldina Bidegain
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Amalia Valdes
6W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Sonia Maranto
9W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Alejandra Jaramillo
9W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
Kim Oppenheimer
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Donna Hird Matthew
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.