Teams

BHatfield (Palisades)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Tues PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-02vs NSiens (Life Time)Won 20
W#2 DoublesJeff Burrell / Chad Gluff vs Greig Altieri / Franklin Lim6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Goldsbury / Keith Gonzales vs Claude Underwood / Aaron Waters7-6, 6-2
2023-04-25vs JNichols/DNunn (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Hatfield / Sean Fredericks vs Nathan Bragg / Thomas Kraus1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-04-18vs MSansotta (WSRC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesBrian Hatfield / Keith Gonzales vs Kevin Seasely / Daniel Kolepp6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeff Burrell / Chad Gluff vs Mario Sansotta / Joseph Dichak6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesScott Johnson / Keith Gonzales vs Brian Conlon / Rich Pietrykowski6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Hatfield / Chad Gluff vs Alven Weil / Justin D'Silva7-6, 6-2
2023-04-04vs KMiller (Weddington)Split 11
L#2 DoublesKeith Gonzales / John Goldsbury vs Bill Brupbacher / Patrick Murchison2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChad Gluff / Sean Fredericks vs Premkumar Jagannathan / Steven Todd1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Bowers / Keith Gonzales vs Rohan Arora / David Proulx3-4
2023-03-14vs DBrantmeyer (PLCC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJason Marriott / Brian Hatfield vs Dan Brantmeyer / Wesley Wright2-6, 4-6
2023-03-07vs NSiens (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDon Nelson / Brian Hatfield vs Andrew VanDerveer / Roger Gum2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRichard Padgett / Chad Gluff vs David Rowland / Jordan Teel3-6, 3-6
2023-02-28vs JNichols/DNunn (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKeith Gonzales / Don Nelson vs Daniel Nunn / Nathan Bragg7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Don Nelson
published
3.79
Chad Gluff
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Charles Bowers
published 4
3.64
Kevin Monty
published
3.51
Keith Gonzales
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Brian Hatfield
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.25
Sean Fredericks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Gonzales + Brian Hatfield31138% games−4.8% vs expected
Chad Gluff + Don Nelson4263% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Don Nelson
45W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Chad Gluff
135W–64L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Charles Bowers
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Kevin Monty
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Keith Gonzales
42W–61L career · 6 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
4
Brian Hatfield
65W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Sean Fredericks
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Vaidyanathan Krishnan
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.