Teams

Smith, Nathan

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Men 5.5

12 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs Lominick, RandyWon 30
W#1 DoublesWesley Self / Gage Rodriguez vs Randy Lominick / Keith Bradford6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Barnard / Tyler Thiessen vs Ray Gore / Suresh Alexander6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesThomas Tynes / Robbie Holt vs Mark Bradshaw / Reid Simmons6-4, 6-4
2026-08-19vs Loftin, ChristopherLost 12
L#1 DoublesTyler Lantz / Seth Thompson vs Kevin Dotson / Weldon Doe2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Barnard / Edward Resch vs Peter Mills / Rob Carpenter0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesWalker Neal / Gage Rodriguez vs Christopher Loftin / Cody Wilkins6-4, 6-3
2026-08-12vs Gladney, JuliusWon 21
W#1 DoublesWalker Neal / Gage Rodriguez vs Julius Gladney / DeMarcus Johnson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMark Fisher / Seth Thompson vs Kyle Carpenter / Jeff Cooper6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesWes Price / Edward Resch vs Tripp Morris / Stonie Lyons6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Walker Neal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Wes Price
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Thomas Tynes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Michael Barnard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Tyler Lantz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Gage Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Wesley Self
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Robbie Holt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Kenny Pilgrim
published
2.46
Edward Resch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mark Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tyler Thiessen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robbie Holt + Thomas Tynes5343% gamesnot enough data
Michael Barnard + Tyler Lantz213 matchesnot enough data
Edward Resch + Gage Rodriguez033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Walker Neal
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Wes Price
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Thomas Tynes
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Michael Barnard
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Tyler Lantz
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Gage Rodriguez
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Wesley Self
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
Robbie Holt
12W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60
Kenny Pilgrim
8W–20L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Edward Resch
5W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
Mark Fisher
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tyler Thiessen
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.