Teams

Yadkin/Thompson-White/18+ 7.5

2026 Yadkin Valley Combo 18 & Over · Women 7.5 - Monday Nights

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-10vs Yadkin/FCC/18+7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesLayne Saunders / Sarah Eugenia Gallo vs Oona O'Neill / Kabler Meyer4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoAnn White / Christina Campbell vs Dawn Frank / Julie Messner6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHolly Hinshelwood / Jocelyn Moye vs Morgan Reece / Beth Campbell6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 - Monday Nights have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Christina Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Layne Saunders
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Tiffany Rash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Holly Hinshelwood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Sara Strassell
published
3.67
Kimberly Busse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Hannah Giles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Sarah Eugenia Gallo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Clarissa Tatum
published 3.5
3.47
Meghan de Young
published
3.43
Jocelyn Moye
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
JoAnn White
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Sarah Gabriel
published
3.27
Katie Thompson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clarissa Tatum + JoAnn White5083% gamesnot enough data
Meghan de Young + Clarissa Tatum314 matchesnot enough data
Clarissa Tatum + Tiffany Rash213 matchesnot enough data
Clarissa Tatum + Sarah Eugenia Gallo303 matchesnot enough data
Clarissa Tatum + Hannah Giles303 matchesnot enough data
JoAnn White + Hannah Giles303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Campbell
34W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Layne Saunders
151W–74L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Tiffany Rash
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Holly Hinshelwood
23W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Sara Strassell
25W–13L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Kimberly Busse
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Hannah Giles
36W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.65
Sarah Eugenia Gallo
27W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Clarissa Tatum
59W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Meghan de Young
43W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Jocelyn Moye
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
JoAnn White
38W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Sarah Gabriel
24W–15L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Katie Thompson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.