Teams

Nicholson

2025 Anne Arundel Combo · Anne Arundel Combo 8.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 4.27 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-12-14vs The Vicious VolliesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKrista Filiopoulos / Elizabeth Forgione vs Bennie Blackley / Ylaska Cohen2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCraig Friedrich / Martha Nolan vs Jessica Bynum / Denise Freeman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-12-07vs HeidlerWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaureen Dupcak / Elizabeth Forgione vs Cathy Shields / Carol Besse6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHillary Kuker / Craig Friedrich vs Pamela Dean / Lynn Bartolotta6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKrista Filiopoulos / Joi Remoll vs Marla LaHaye / Sally Christie6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-12-06vs The Vicious VolliesWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaureen Dupcak / Nikki Basile vs Jessica Bynum / Brita Robinson7-6, 4-4
W#2 DoublesMargie Davis / Craig Friedrich vs Mekkla Thompson / Carolyn Greis6-4, 6-3
2025-11-22vs The Vicious VolliesLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Beling / Sally Labella vs Jessica Bynum / Brita Robinson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Sweeney / Katherine Tindall vs Eboni Lance / Janette O Logan2-6, 5-7
2025-11-15vs HeidlerWon 20
W#2 DoublesKaren Beling / Sally Labella vs Monica Maloney / Sue Fisher7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesArina Kravitz / Elizabeth Forgione vs Carol Besse / Stephanie Zorn6-1, 6-4
2025-11-10vs HeidlerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaureen Dupcak / Joi Remoll vs Tatiana Loboda / Amy Tacka6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Beling / Sally Labella vs Marla LaHaye / Monica Maloney6-4, 6-3
2025-11-02vs The Vicious VolliesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMargie Davis / Katherine Tindall vs Eboni Lance / Janette O Logan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Beling / Diane Sweeney vs Denise Freeman / Maria Scaler6-7, 1-5
2025-10-18vs HeidlerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRoselle Nicholson / Sara Wagner vs Carol Besse / Stephanie Zorn3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCraig Friedrich / Joi Remoll vs Susanne Mendiola / Jennifer Murduck1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-12vs The Vicious VolliesLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Forgione / Arina Kravitz vs Anne Jagodits / Denise Freeman6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMartha Nolan / Joi Remoll vs Mekkla Thompson / Carolyn Greis6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-10-05vs HeidlerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMaureen Dupcak / Joi Remoll vs Sue Fisher / Amy Tacka6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Tindall / Elizabeth Forgione vs Pamela Dean / Kristen Mahoney7-6, 4-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Combo 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Maureen Dupcak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Margie Davis
published
4.25
Leslie Baird
published 4.5
4.16
Nikki Basile
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Arina Kravitz
published 4.5
4.07
Elizabeth Forgione
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
4.06
Karen Beling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.96
Martha Nolan
published
3.93
Katherine Tindall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Craig Friedrich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Joi Remoll
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.76
Roselle Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.70
Diane Sweeney
published 4
3.65
Mary Jane Evans
published
3.52
Sara Wagner
published
Hillary Kuker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Baird + Maureen Dupcak5259% games+13.8% vs expected
Karen Beling + Maureen Dupcak8163% games+7.3% vs expected
Joi Remoll + Craig Friedrich9460% games+3.3% vs expected
Craig Friedrich + Katherine Tindall11364% games+2.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Forgione + Katherine Tindall16559% games+2.0% vs expected
Joi Remoll + Katherine Tindall10264% games−1.4% vs expected
Joi Remoll + Roselle Nicholson9955% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Baird + Elizabeth Forgione7159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maureen Dupcak
103W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
Margie Davis
36W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Leslie Baird
71W–28L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Nikki Basile
68W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Arina Kravitz
19W–26L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Elizabeth Forgione
97W–31L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.07
4.5
Karen Beling
76W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
Martha Nolan
43W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Katherine Tindall
150W–64L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Craig Friedrich
101W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Joi Remoll
143W–83L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4.5
Roselle Nicholson
97W–72L career · 1 line in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.76
4
Diane Sweeney
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Mary Jane Evans
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Sara Wagner
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.52
Hillary Kuker
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.