Teams

STC:Sportsmen's:Chan

2024 EMA Adult 18 & Over Men · 3.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-23vs W109:Wimbledon:BourdeauLost 23
L#1 DoublesJob Chan / Shane Niles vs Scott Heide / Stephen Bourdeau6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDmitry Kiselyov vs Carlos Cuevas2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrew Barr / Joshua Das vs Arturo Vegas / Calvin Koo2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRich Balaban vs Lyle Analetto6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJustin McCarty / Jeff Tiger vs Jinbyung Chae / David Sonner5-7, 4-5
2024-07-16vs WAY:Wayside:Andersen/CunninghamLost 05
L#1 DoublesJob Chan / John Jacobs vs Tom Rosedale / Ashvin Kalyanaraman3-6, 6-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDmitry Kiselyov vs Alexander Ho1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKenton Guan / Andrew Barr vs Bharath Padala / Charles Cannon4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRich Balaban vs Lucas Mundel6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnthony Shull / Justin McCarty vs Arvind Ramaswamy / Joseph Blake2-6, 5-7
2024-07-09vs WTC:Winchester:Jain/KachraniWon 32
W#1 DoublesJob Chan / Kenton Guan vs Prashant Shambharkar / Abhay Misra6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesPeter Kaplan vs Avinash Kumar7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBruce Haimowitz / Dmitry Kiselyov vs Pranav Samudra / Aditya Tiwari6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRich Balaban vs Bhavin Patel6-1, 4-1
L#3 DoublesAnthony Shull / Shane Niles vs Saroosh Irani / Thejakumara Krishnegowda6-7, 6-7
2024-06-25vs LTC:Uncanny Volleys:Fridella/KirbyLost 23
W#1 DoublesJohn Jacobs / Job Chan vs John Dickason / Garrett Rogers7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKenton Guan vs John Hall6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAndrew Barr / Bruce Haimowitz vs Clifton Jay / Thomas Kirby6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesDmitry Kiselyov vs Peter Nohrnberg1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChris Sanges / Thomas Hallock vs Byron Price / Kiran P3-6, 2-6
2024-06-11vs WTC:Topspin Troopers:Chen/WangLost 23
L#1 DoublesAndrew Barr / Dmitry Kiselyov vs Xiaowu Zhang / Ronghua Hu0-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesPeter Kaplan vs Evan Marks6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Jacobs / Kenton Guan vs YAN CHEN / Zhiyong Yang7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJob Chan vs Boyang Sun5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Tiger / Shane Niles vs Chenke Li / Lei Lai2-6, 4-6
2024-05-28vs WAC:Wac Pack:CallevaWon 41
W#1 DoublesJob Chan / John Jacobs vs Adam Kerstien / Richard Maddams6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPeter Kaplan vs Nicholas Ducoff6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Barr / Dmitry Kiselyov vs Steven Wong / Christopher Calleva6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesChris Sanges vs Thomas Pickering3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBruce Haimowitz / Anthony Shull vs Jean Roy / Umesh Kurpad6-2, 7-5
2024-05-21vs WTC:Winchester:Jain/KachraniWon 41
L#1 DoublesJoshua Das / Dmitry Kiselyov vs Ravi Jhumat / Aditya Tiwari6-0, 4-4
W#1 SinglesPeter Kaplan vs Bhavin Patel6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndrew Barr / Kenton Guan vs Rakesh Dsouza / Saroosh Irani6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJob Chan vs Avinash Kumar6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRich Balaban / Jeff Tiger vs Srivas Padmanabhan / Subrata Baguli6-1, 6-2
2024-05-14vs WAY:Wayside:Andersen/CunninghamLost 23
L#1 DoublesAndrew Barr / Dmitry Kiselyov vs Tom Rosedale / Bharath Padala6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPeter Kaplan vs Arvind Ramaswamy6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnthony Shull / Kenton Guan vs KIRAN KASHALKAR / Alexander Ho4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJob Chan vs Lucas Mundel6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShane Niles / Thomas Hallock vs Ashvin Kalyanaraman / Joseph Blake2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BRTC:Spector's Therapy Group:Spector000000
2MAC:Manchester:Mills0672349319
3BRTC:Bass River:Burke/Campbell07241129264
4TRU:Trull Brook:Sivakumaran/DeMarco07191636291
5CED:Cedardale McDonald:/Moore07181739320
6SFT:Dark Horses:Karbassi/Ly07142146359
7KIG:Kingsmen:Martin/Givney07142147344
8LAK:Lakeville:Anthony07102554357
9WTC:Topspin Troopers:Chen/Wang08301021240
10BBC:Brown Billone:Rec/Berkowitz08301024258
11W109:Wimbledon:Bourdeau08251533316
12WAY:Wayside:Andersen/Cunningham08261434300
13STC:Sportsmen's:Chan08192146350
14WAC:Wac Pack:Calleva08172353374
15LTC:Uncanny Volleys:Fridella/Kirby08122861412
16WTC:Winchester:Jain/Kachrani08112964436

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Andrew Barr
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.30
Bruce Haimowitz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Job Chan
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
3.24
Dmitry Kiselyov
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
James Kilgore
published
3.17
Joshua Das
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Anthony Shull
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Justin McCarty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Chris Sanges
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Jeff Tiger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Jacobs
published
Kenton Guan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
Peter Kaplan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Rich Balaban
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Shane Niles
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Thomas Hallock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Barr + Bruce Haimowitz6555% games+1.6% vs expected
Andrew Barr + Kenton Guan4164% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Barr + Joshua Das224 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Barr + Dmitry Kiselyov134 matchesnot enough data
Job Chan + Anthony Shull134 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Barr + Shane Niles213 matchesnot enough data
Job Chan + Shane Niles123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Barr
36W–26L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Bruce Haimowitz
38W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Job Chan
59W–37L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Dmitry Kiselyov
25W–29L career · 8 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
James Kilgore
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Joshua Das
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Anthony Shull
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.15
Justin McCarty
9W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
Chris Sanges
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jeff Tiger
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Jacobs
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kenton Guan
23W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Kaplan
12W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rich Balaban
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shane Niles
16W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Hallock
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.