Teams

DVMT/Nagal/San Ramon

2025 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-18vs Put the ball away/Chang/SunnyvaleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeremy Famularcano / Sumit Nagal vs Stephen Li / Theo Novak3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPunyanjan Sen / Riyazudeen Abdul Subhan vs Kuan Chang / Vladan Popovic1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVishy Venkitakrishnan / Harsha Varun vs Andrew Liu / Chris Ling6-3, 6-2
2025-10-17vs Minions/Shih/Palo AltoLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeremy Famularcano / Matt Lourens vs Bhaskar Sarma / Allen Shih4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPRITESH SONU / Chandra Mouli vs Chuo-Yun Yang / Jackie Guo2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesVishy Venkitakrishnan / Harsha Varun vs Jingfan Sun / Shi Dong6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
4.29
Matt Lourens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Sumit Nagal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Jeremy Famularcano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
PRITESH SONU
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Punyanjan Sen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Riyazudeen Abdul Subhan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Harsha Varun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Chandra Mouli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Vishy Venkitakrishnan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Nimesh Gandhi
published 3.5
3.20
Giridharan Anandan
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sanjith Senthilkumar
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.52
Matt Lourens
35W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
Sumit Nagal
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Jeremy Famularcano
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
PRITESH SONU
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Punyanjan Sen
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Riyazudeen Abdul Subhan
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Harsha Varun
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Chandra Mouli
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Vishy Venkitakrishnan
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Nimesh Gandhi
147W–82L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Giridharan Anandan
62W–99L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.