Teams

Arbor Greene - C. VanMeter

2022 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-06vs Westchase Winners - P. HayesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAMY ISAAC vs Aidsha Pastrana2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJiyoung Yoon / Rebecca Gaier vs Cara Anderson / Zalila Leclercq6-2, 6-2
2022-05-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Gaier / AMY ISAAC vs Jennifer Carlson / Melissa Kandell6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelley Coffey / Rebecca Gaier vs Karen Cleland / Sherry Peterson6-1, 6-4
2022-05-09vs Van Dyke Farms - P. MooreWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandra Bell / Rebecca Gaier vs Stephanie van Brocklin / Helen Reynolds7-5, 6-2
2022-05-02vs Cheval - B. BurdetteLost 02
L#1 SinglesRebecca Gaier vs Joanne Urban0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCrystal Vanmeter / AMY ISAAC vs Vera Trayner / Anjali Singh6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-25vs Westchase Winners - P. HayesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJiyoung Yoon / AMY ISAAC vs Cara Anderson / Melissa Bode6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCrystal Vanmeter / Rebecca Gaier vs DIANA POSADA / Heidi Pogue5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCeleste Kallenborn / AMY ISAAC vs Chet Gowda / Marisol Cohen6-2, 6-2
2022-04-11vs Hills - VanDyke Slice Girls/FarkasLost 01
L#2 DoublesAMY ISAAC / Rebecca Gaier vs Johnessa Hern / Gina Lund3-6, 3-6
2022-04-04vs GH Slammers - L. BacardiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCrystal Vanmeter / AMY ISAAC vs Lourdes Bacardi / Carol Snyder6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKelley Coffey / Rebecca Gaier vs Jennifer Carlson / Debbie Welsh6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
AMY ISAAC
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.06
Rebecca Gaier
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3.5
2.97
Jiyoung Yoon
published
2.90
Crystal Vanmeter
published 3
2.82
Kelley Coffey
published
2.75
Sandra Bell
published
2.63
Amy Butts
published 3
2.23
Cheri Snyder
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Gaier + AMY ISAAC121055% gamesnot enough data
Kelley Coffey + Jiyoung Yoon224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
AMY ISAAC
107W–59L career · 7 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Rebecca Gaier
148W–84L career · 8 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jiyoung Yoon
11W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Crystal Vanmeter
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
Kelley Coffey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Sandra Bell
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Amy Butts
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Cheri Snyder
11W–24L career · no lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.