Teams

FRHS BLUE

2022 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - DEN · MIXED 9.5 - ITA

14 players · average NTRP 4.69 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-21vs TTA SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesJacob Escobedo / Susanna Styve vs Tyler Zappia / Emily Paulson3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Wallace / Shawn Farnell vs Tanya Cumalat / Gary Dias2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKim van Ginkel / Jesse Chavez vs Thiago Najman Nejm / Jordan Soldano3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-08-07vs NJ BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesLucas Martin / Leslie Jamison vs Joshua Simmons / Jasmine Muniz-Cadorette6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShawn Farnell / Andrea Wallace vs Kevin Runda / Abby Runda6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJacob Escobedo / Sara Schoenbeck vs Greg Beehler / Karen Jensen4-6, 4-6
2022-07-31vs NJ REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Kuseski / Mattison Sperry vs Craig Hoeltgen / Michelle Mathiesen4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesShawn Farnell / Andrea Wallace vs Brandon Kuhl / Tucker Humphrey4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesGabriel Pagat / Susanna Styve vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-24vs TTA SILVERLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim van Ginkel / Robert Kuseski vs Anastassiya Zherdeva / Gary Dias3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusanna Styve / Lucas Martin vs Chelsea Crowell / Nik Yip5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMadissen Allen / Gabriel Pagat vs Paloma Vazquez / Daniel Lizarribar6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-17vs NJ BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesRobert Kuseski / Mattison Sperry vs Forrest Kennel / Jasmine Muniz-Cadorette6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesIan Powers / Leslie Jamison vs Nick Salazar / Kimberly Greason5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLucas Martin / Kim van Ginkel vs Jackson Johnstone / Zsofia Alfonso7-6, 6-3
2022-07-10vs NJ REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesLucas Martin / Leslie Jamison vs Craig Hoeltgen / Michelle Mathiesen6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesGabriel Pagat / Madissen Allen vs Brandon Jacquez / Emily Pedersen7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIan Powers / Sara Schoenbeck vs Anish Parikh / Tucker Humphrey6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MIXED 9.5 - ITA
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TTA SILVER5112618166
2FRHS BLUE2471125192

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.46 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.84
Kim van Ginkel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.82
Jacob Escobedo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.68
Mattison Sperry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.62
Lucas Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.54
Gabriel Pagat
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.43
Ian Powers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.43
Andrea Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Shawn Farnell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Madissen Allen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.20
Susanna Styve
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Jesse Chavez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Leslie Jamison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Robert Kuseski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sara Schoenbeck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucas Martin + Susanna Styve3350% games−8.5% vs expected
Shawn Farnell + Andrea Wallace1842% games−12.6% vs expected
Robert Kuseski + Kim van Ginkel314 matchesnot enough data
Jesse Chavez + Susanna Styve134 matchesnot enough data
Robert Kuseski + Andrea Wallace303 matchesnot enough data
Gabriel Pagat + Madissen Allen033 matchesnot enough data
Shawn Farnell + Susanna Styve213 matchesnot enough data
Shawn Farnell + Mattison Sperry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Kim van Ginkel
13W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.84
5
Jacob Escobedo
39W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
4.82
Mattison Sperry
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.68
Lucas Martin
32W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.62
5
Gabriel Pagat
4W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
4.54
4.5
Ian Powers
59W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Andrea Wallace
37W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
4.43
4.5
Shawn Farnell
78W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Madissen Allen
42W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Susanna Styve
81W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
Jesse Chavez
40W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.16
Leslie Jamison
24W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.15
Robert Kuseski
14W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Schoenbeck
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.