Teams

LOTA/Jane Melilli

2025 LOTA USTA Adult 55 & Over Women - Fall · Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-21vs LOTA/Jena WillWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelli Bray / Gail Watkins vs Ellen Hawk / Jena Will6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCheryl Mazza / Kimberly Smith vs Sally Beach / ADRIANA VELEZ6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Hiatt / Jane Melilli vs D'Jean Carter / Debbie Pas6-2, 6-2
2024-11-14vs LOTA/Jena WillWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly Smith / Kathryn Hein vs Julie Smith / Jena Will6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeannine Flynn / Geri Pomerantz vs Sandra Lucius / Betty McHan6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDiane Brahn / Jane Sowell vs Ellen Shea / Ellen Hawk6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-11-11vs LOTA/Jena WillWon 30
W#1 DoublesCatherine Forscht / Cheryl Mazza vs Helen Keipper / Brinkley Pound6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKathryn Hein / Kimberly Smith vs Julie Smith / Sandra Lucius6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDiane Brahn / Jane Melilli vs Ellen Hawk / ADRIANA VELEZ6-0, 6-4
2024-10-24vs LOTA/Jena WillWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelli Bray / Gail Watkins vs Betty McHan / ADRIANA VELEZ6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Mazza / Susan Mason vs Ellen Hawk / Sally Beach6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGeri Pomerantz / Jennifer Garrison vs D'Jean Carter / Debbie Pas6-1, 6-1
2024-10-17vs LOTA/Jena WillWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeannine Flynn / Jeanne Mosakowski vs Brinkley Pound / Sally Beach6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKimberly Smith / Cheryl Mazza vs Helen Keipper / Sandra Lucius6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathryn Hein / Geri Pomerantz vs Betty McHan / Ellen Shea6-3, 6-2
2024-10-10vs LOTA/Jena WillWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Brahn / Catherine Forscht vs ADRIANA VELEZ / Debbie Pas6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Hiatt / Jennifer Garrison vs Helen Keipper / Lisa Lozano6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJane Sowell / Susan Mason vs D'Jean Carter / Ellen Hawk6-4, 6-1
2024-10-03vs LOTA/Jena WillWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Brahn / Jeanne Mosakowski vs Betty McHan / Julie Smith6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Mason / Cheryl Mazza vs Lisa Lozano / Sandra Lucius6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJane Melilli / Jennifer Garrison vs Ellen Shea / Jena Will6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Jeannine Flynn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Jane Melilli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Catherine Forscht
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Kathryn Hein
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Cheryl Mazza
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Geri Pomerantz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Gail Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Jeanne Mosakowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Diane Brahn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Jennifer Garrison
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Hiatt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jane Sowell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kelli Bray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Hein + Geri Pomerantz5158% games−1.6% vs expected
Cheryl Mazza + Catherine Forscht5451% games−3.6% vs expected
Gail Watkins + Jeanne Mosakowski3258% gamesnot enough data
Kathryn Hein + Cheryl Mazza213 matchesnot enough data
Jane Sowell + Diane Brahn303 matchesnot enough data
Diane Brahn + Jane Melilli213 matchesnot enough data
Diane Brahn + Elizabeth Hiatt123 matchesnot enough data
Jane Melilli + Geri Pomerantz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeannine Flynn
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Jane Melilli
15W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Catherine Forscht
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Kathryn Hein
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Cheryl Mazza
13W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Geri Pomerantz
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Gail Watkins
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jeanne Mosakowski
11W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Diane Brahn
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Jennifer Garrison
21W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Elizabeth Hiatt
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Sowell
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelli Bray
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.