Teams

Geisler-Warrior Princesses

2022 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Cheryl Geisler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Tammy LaFrazia
published 3.5
3.21
Vicki Blunt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Heidi Kjos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-08-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Cheryl Geisler vs Casey Billings / Courtney Casi6-2, 7-6
2022-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Cheryl Geisler vs Eliza Oh / Kathy Schaub6-4, 6-4
2022-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Vicki Blunt vs Rebecca Griffith / Rochelle Pluymers6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kjos / Vicki Blunt vs Erin Casey / Colleen Nolan6-0, 6-4
2022-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Vicki Blunt vs Angie Stromquist / Cate Harrington6-1, 6-2
2022-07-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Vicki Blunt vs Parish Burns / Kimberly Parks6-3, 6-4
2022-06-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Geisler / Vicki Blunt vs Kari Hastings / Inna Vlad6-1, 6-4
2022-06-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesVicki Blunt / Cheryl Geisler vs Chrys Culver / Sara Swanborn6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Cheryl Geisler
124W–100L career
0%97%3%
3.39
3.5
Tammy LaFrazia
44W–25L career
not enough data
3.5
Vicki Blunt
89W–109L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Heidi Kjos
74W–115L career
14%86%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.