Teams

Am.Barclay55C

2026 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.68 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs Jo.Taylor55CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristen Stocking / Lynelle Boorey vs Isabelle Homes Gesher / Bunny Ratledge3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Holt / Ann Gray vs Deanna Drescher / Wendy Burkard7-6, 6-2
2026-08-17vs Di.Sauer55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Lahey / Brenda Li vs Tobi Buckley / Virgina Wilson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Shelby / Ann Gray vs Bobbie West / Amy Merdes6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kuzma / Patrice Dovel vs Tammy Kozacko / Phyllis Soltz6-1, 4-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Kristin Lahey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Sarah Shelby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Ann Bentley
published 4
3.71
Jennifer Kuzma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
3.56
Jennifer Holt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Kristen Stocking
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Brenda Li
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Amy Barclay
published 3.5
3.41
Patrice Dovel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Adrienne Todd
published 3.5
3.35
Ann Gray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Jami Kim-Rowley
published 3.5
3.27
Lynelle Boorey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brenda Li + Jami Kim-Rowley26462% games+6.2% vs expected
Kristin Lahey + Adrianne Leinbach192252% games+0.2% vs expected
Kristen Stocking + Brenda Li11556% games−0.3% vs expected
Adrienne Todd + Jennifer Kuzma314 matchesnot enough data
Adrianne Leinbach + Brenda Li213 matchesnot enough data
Adrianne Leinbach + Jami Kim-Rowley123 matchesnot enough data
Lynelle Boorey + Jami Kim-Rowley213 matchesnot enough data
Adrienne Todd + Brenda Li213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristin Lahey
190W–166L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Sarah Shelby
49W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Ann Bentley
4W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Jennifer Kuzma
51W–68L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Adrianne Leinbach
239W–223L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
Jennifer Holt
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Kristen Stocking
157W–80L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Brenda Li
276W–107L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Amy Barclay
26W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Patrice Dovel
196W–154L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Adrienne Todd
33W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
3.5
Ann Gray
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Jami Kim-Rowley
139W–53L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Lynelle Boorey
97W–77L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.