Teams

YMCA:Plummer

2026 NH Adult 40 & Over Women Day · 2.5 Women 1

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-25vs YMCA:Termine:HendryLost 12
W#1 DoublesSuping Li / Shelley Song vs Paula Termine / Marilyn Mitchell7-6, 4-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHilary Mortimer vs Samantha Astarita0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Rosen / Margaret Tomas vs Patty Pemberton / Joreen Hendry2-6, 1-6
2026-06-23vs WWCC:SeaQueens:Mangano:CassinLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohanna Reagan / Sandra L'Heureux vs Bridget Stebbins / Julie Bisognano3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Smith / Suping Li vs Janice DiLorenzo / Anne Miller1-6, 2-6
2026-06-09vs WWCC:SeaQueens:Mangano:CassinLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandra L'Heureux / Johanna Reagan vs Janice DiLorenzo / Bridget Stebbins2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMargaret Tomas vs Kristin Cabot6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShelley Song / Suping Li vs Julie Bisognano / Maureen Ahn6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-03vs GH:ShotSisters:Merkle: LefebvreWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohanna Reagan / Sandra L'Heureux vs Ann Shibley / Miki Pike6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Rosen / Shelley Song vs Nanette Avril / Kathleen Reidy4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-27vs YMCA:Termine:HendryLost 03
L#1 DoublesShelley Song / Hilary Mortimer vs Joreen Hendry / Samantha Astarita1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMargaret Tomas vs Kelly Cohen3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Smith / Johanna Reagan vs Paula Termine / Mu-Jane Monk2-6, 5-7
2026-05-20vs WWCC:SeaQueens:Mangano:CassinLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohanna Reagan / Shelley Song vs Victoria Lehn / Anne Miller3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJulianne Murthi vs Kristin Cabot4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Rosen / Jennifer Smith vs Janice DiLorenzo / Carly Hogue6-7, 1-6
2026-05-06vs YMCA:Termine:HendryWon 21
L#1 DoublesJohanna Reagan / Sandra L'Heureux vs Kelly Cohen / Samantha Astarita1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJulianne Murthi vs Mu-Jane Monk6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMargaret Tomas / Hilary Mortimer vs Marge Pagliuca / Patty Pemberton6-1, 6-3
2026-04-22vs GH:ShotSisters:Merkle: LefebvreWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohanna Reagan / Shelley Song vs Janice Lefebvre / Ann Shibley7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.33
Margaret Tomas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.28
Catherine Gagnon
published 2.5
2.19
Suping Li
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Johanna Reagan
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.15
Shelley Song
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.11
Sandra L'Heureux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Julianne Murthi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
1.97
Hilary Mortimer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.95
Nancy Rosen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Johanna Reagan + Sandra L'Heureux4540% games+1.5% vs expected
Suping Li + Shelley Song9948% games−2.8% vs expected
Catherine Gagnon + Sandra L'Heureux044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Tomas
15W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Catherine Gagnon
50W–94L career · no lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
Suping Li
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Johanna Reagan
11W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Shelley Song
23W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Sandra L'Heureux
25W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Julianne Murthi
8W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Hilary Mortimer
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Nancy Rosen
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.