Teams

Sorensen

2022 Neb. Adult 18&Over · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-28vs NE/Penland/18&Over3.5MSplit 11
W#1 SinglesRyan McLeod vs Greg Hauer6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Khong / David Crotzer vs Edward Wetherbee / Jason Luedtke3-6, 4-6
2022-06-13vs NE/Penland/18&Over3.5MWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Crotzer / John Khong vs Edward Wetherbee / Dale Dixon7-5, 6-4
2022-06-06vs NE/Penland/18&Over3.5MSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJohn Micka / David Crotzer vs Satya Maddipati / Sheetal Munjewar4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJason Koranda vs Greg Hauer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRyan McLeod vs Jeff Bell6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRoss Jensen / Colin Sorensen vs Roger Penland / Edward Wetherbee6-2, 6-0
2022-05-23vs NE/Penland/18&Over3.5MWon 31
W#1 DoublesColin Sorensen / Ross Jensen vs Mike Gardner / Neil Jouvenat6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRyan McLeod vs Greg Hauer6-7, 4-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Micka / David Crotzer vs Sheetal Munjewar / Jason Luedtke3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJay Otto / John Khong vs Jeff Bell / Roger Penland3-6, 2-6
2022-05-16vs NE/Penland/18&Over3.5MLost 13
W#1 DoublesColin Sorensen / Ross Jensen vs Dale Dixon / Mike Gardner6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJason Koranda vs Ashwin Chandran6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Khong vs Brandon Vasholz2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesClint Johnson / David Crotzer vs Jeff Bell / Benjamin Katt0-6, 3-6
2022-05-09vs NE/Penland/18&Over3.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Micka / David Crotzer vs Neil Jouvenat / Ashwin Chandran6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJason Koranda vs Benjamin Katt6-7, 1-6
2022-04-25Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRyan McLeod vs Greg Hauer2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Ross Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Colin Sorensen
published 4
3.30
David Crotzer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jason Koranda
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
John Khong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Nikhil Warke
published
Ryan McLeod
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ross Jensen
105W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Colin Sorensen
9W–19L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
David Crotzer
24W–43L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Jason Koranda
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
John Khong
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nikhil Warke
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan McLeod
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.