Teams

Pham - Mazarick

2024 Sandhills Adult 18 & over · 3.0 Adult Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesKarl Molnar / Robin Headrick vs Johnny Hancock / Shawn Smith6-3, 7-6
2024-05-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesKarl Molnar / Robin Headrick vs Earl Crouch / Randy Roll3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-22Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKarl Molnar / Harold Miller vs Earl Crouch / Randy Roll6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Pham / Robin Headrick vs Reza Abbas / Chris Rhue6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-18vs Hancock - Highland Country ClubSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKarl Molnar / Thomas Coker vs Johnny Hancock / Nicholas Hancock6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobin Headrick / Harold Miller vs Mitch Guy / Kenneth Barefoot2-6, 3-6
2024-03-14vs Hancock - Highland Country ClubSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKarl Molnar / Thomas Coker vs Patrick Smith / Nicholas Hancock6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Pham / Robin Headrick vs Mitch Guy / Kenneth Barefoot4-6, 4-6
2024-03-07Split 11
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Pham / Karl Molnar vs Drew Starr / Randy Roll7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRobin Headrick / Drew Thomas vs Reza Abbas / Earl Crouch3-6, 3-6
2024-02-22vs Hancock - Highland Country ClubWon 20
W#1 DoublesThomas Coker / Karl Molnar vs Mitch Guy / Patrick Smith6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobin Headrick / Harold Miller vs Johnny Hancock / Nicholas Hancock6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Benjamin Pham
published 3.5
3.24
Harold Miller
published
3.19
Karl Molnar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.17
Thomas Coker
published
3.12
Quincy Jones
published
Robin Headrick
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Tiler Rackley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Headrick + Karl Molnar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Benjamin Pham
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Harold Miller
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Karl Molnar
36W–16L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.19
Thomas Coker
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Quincy Jones
7W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Robin Headrick
13W–21L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tiler Rackley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.