Teams

High Point/Villalobos W4.0S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Sunday · W4.0S

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesRoz Erlewein / Jill Thompson vs Blaine Eschenburg / Beckey Fuller7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTammy Anderson / Therese Blackburn vs August Wood / Elizabeth Smith6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaria Caldwell / Gina Paterno Villalobos vs Rachel Stoll / Anne Givens7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W4.0S have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Kristen Aragon
published
3.88
Roz Erlewein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Maria Caldwell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Nycole Vu
published
3.85
Beth Parks
published 4
3.78
Katherine Motlagh
published
3.75
Jannine Soldan
published
3.73
Nidia Bridges
published
3.69
Denise Lu
published 4
3.68
Theresa Batoon
published
3.63
Gina Paterno Villalobos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Shannon Craig
published
3.58
Duang-Nate TRISARNSRI
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.55
Jo Ann Compton
published
3.42
Suzanne Kim
published
Rita Wilson
published
Therese Blackburn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Caldwell + Kristen Aragon7459% games+8.0% vs expected
Beth Parks + Kristen Aragon9063% games+5.4% vs expected
Beth Parks + Jannine Soldan7063% games+3.0% vs expected
Nycole Vu + Denise Lu4156% gamesnot enough data
Maria Caldwell + Jannine Soldan224 matchesnot enough data
Maria Caldwell + Beth Parks303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Aragon
34W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
Roz Erlewein
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Maria Caldwell
24W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Nycole Vu
33W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Beth Parks
30W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Katherine Motlagh
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Jannine Soldan
21W–10L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Nidia Bridges
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Denise Lu
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
Theresa Batoon
28W–18L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Gina Paterno Villalobos
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Shannon Craig
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Duang-Nate TRISARNSRI
23W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
Jo Ann Compton
13W–22L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Suzanne Kim
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Rita Wilson
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Therese Blackburn
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.