Teams

Park-Kang Ticket 8.5 Mixed

2022 Frederick Combo Mixed · Frederick Combo Mixed 8.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-04-30Won 20
W#2 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / Fatih Selekler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSteve French / Dian Zhang vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-23vs Clark 8.5 Mixed ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesDian Zhang / Daniel Park vs Lynn Bartolotta / Bill Bartolotta4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-04-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Park / Dian Zhang vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-11vs Lee/Dao 8.5 Mixed ComboWon 10
W#3 DoublesDian Zhang / Steve French vs Malika Rasheed / Denis Vashuk6-2, 6-4
2022-04-05vs Clark 8.5 Mixed ComboWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnne Jagodits / DONALD CRAWLEY vs Jana Conigliaro / Brian Clark7-5, 7-5
2022-04-03vs Cady 8.5 Mixed ComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesLuis Lozano / Dian Zhang vs Christen Harsha / Dwayne Herndon7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2022-03-26vs Lee/Dao 8.5 Mixed ComboLost 01
L#3 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / DONALD CRAWLEY vs Robert Kargus / Kristina Leary3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-22vs Baynard 8.5 Mixed ComboWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Park / Dian Zhang vs Wendy Heger / David French6-0, 6-0
2022-03-19vs Clark 8.5 Mixed ComboWon 20
W#1 DoublesTim Huber / Dian Zhang vs Michele Bloom / Harris Rosenblatt6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDONALD CRAWLEY / Anne Jagodits vs Mike James / Mekkla Thompson6-2, 6-1
2022-03-07vs Lee/Dao 8.5 Mixed ComboLost 02
L#2 DoublesDian Zhang / Daniel Park vs Waymon Peet / Arina Kravitz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFatih Selekler / Farzaneh Navid vs Sarah Bowman / Christopher Lee4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Combo Mixed 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Luis Lozano
published
4.33
Steve French
published
Gianna Kang
published 4.5
4.23
Anne Jagodits
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Farzaneh Navid
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.93
Dian Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Susan Rhee
published
3.85
DONALD CRAWLEY
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
3.36
Kerry Spicer
published
Tim Huber
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Lozano
68W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
4.40
Steve French
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Gianna Kang
16W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Anne Jagodits
208W–213L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Farzaneh Navid
119W–111L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%25%75%
4.09
4
Dian Zhang
229W–109L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.93
Susan Rhee
32W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
DONALD CRAWLEY
473W–252L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Christine Pagendarm
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kerry Spicer
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
3.36
Tim Huber
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.