Teams

Rodeck/HCP/Foothills

2022 Foothills Spring 18 & Over League · Women 2.5

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-18vs Geyer/HCP/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Rodeck / Kathy Collins vs Jennifer Mcmillan / Angela Xionschevici6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesStaci Shafer vs Rachel Boisvert0-6, 1-6
2022-05-04vs Atwood/LHCC/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 SinglesJulie Rodeck vs Charleyn Mahoney6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLori Phelps / Staci Shafer vs Heather Mills / Laura Howe-Mallard6-1, 6-2
2022-04-27vs Geyer/HCP/FoothillsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesZenaida Camacho / Staci Shafer vs Emily Fisher / Rachel Boisvert1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJulie Rodeck vs Angela Xionschevici6-1, 6-1
2022-04-06vs Atwood/LHCC/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulie Rodeck / Staci Shafer vs Amy Winfield / Donna Atwood3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Phelps / Zenaida Camacho vs Charleyn Mahoney / Laura Howe-Mallard6-3, 6-2
2022-03-30vs Geyer/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 SinglesJulie Rodeck vs Angela Xionschevici6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLori Phelps / Staci Shafer vs Emily Fisher / Jennifer Mcmillan7-5, 7-5
2022-03-27vs Atwood/LHCC/FoothillsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesStaci Shafer vs Amy Monroe6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesZenaida Camacho / Sharon Bush vs Charleyn Mahoney / Casey Prince1-6, 4-6
2022-03-09vs Geyer/HCP/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Rodeck / Lisa Moore vs Rachel Boisvert / Jennifer Mcmillan2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Bush / Staci Shafer vs Marianna Geyer / Emily Fisher6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-02-23vs Atwood/LHCC/FoothillsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJulie Rodeck vs Amy Winfield0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLori Phelps / Zenaida Camacho vs Charleyn Mahoney / Casey Prince6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Staci Shafer
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.90
Kathy Collins
published
2.51
Julie Rodeck
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.42
Zenaida Camacho
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Staci Shafer + Kathy Collins8162% games+16.0% vs expected
Staci Shafer + Zenaida Camacho185739% games−0.1% vs expected
Zenaida Camacho + Julie Rodeck9459% gamesnot enough data
Staci Shafer + Julie Rodeck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Staci Shafer
197W–225L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
Kathy Collins
33W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Julie Rodeck
84W–110L career · 7 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Zenaida Camacho
93W–164L career · 4 lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.