Teams

MBell (Charlotte CC)

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-04vs ADonathan (Life Time)Split 22
L#1 DoublesChristina Brunnemer / Melissa Lovett vs Leezah Pratt / Kacey Kopley4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Schaaf vs Nichole Hyland6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrandon Boyd / Lauren Dunaway vs Alexis Galbreath / Kathleen Ciminelli6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAnna Glass vs Lea Powell7-6, 6-3
2025-03-14vs MZvara (Queens)Split 22
L#1 DoublesAmy Schaaf / Rachel Lee vs Amanda Frank / Leigh Young4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMandi Bell / Jordan Collier vs Taylor Russ / Margo Cash7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBridget Browne vs Julie Lowe3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCathy Austin / Tracey Cook vs Christina Burgess / Jennie Corbett6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Christina Brunnemer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Laura Judd
published
3.31
Lauren Dunaway
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Jordan Collier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Amy Schaaf
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Bridget Browne
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Cathy Austin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Tracey Cook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Anna Glass
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Mandi Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Erin Stubbs
published
Melissa Lovett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Brunnemer
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Laura Judd
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Lauren Dunaway
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.31
Jordan Collier
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Amy Schaaf
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Bridget Browne
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cathy Austin
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tracey Cook
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Anna Glass
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Mandi Bell
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Erin Stubbs
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Melissa Lovett
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.