Teams

LLW SGV The Rookies-Gonzales-Independence Park/SU1

2022 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesJoshua Kim / Khoa Do vs Gavin Lau / Michael Lu6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesZachary Ambrosio / Nicholas Ambrosio vs Nathaniel Israel / Hugh Allen6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEli Alejo / Anthony Hean vs Hao Truong / Brian Chen6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNicholas Ambrosio / Simon Ketema vs Chad Rodriguez / Nathaniel Israel7-6
W#3 DoublesEli Alejo / Ismael Soria vs Eric Chang / Hao Truong6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesZachary Ambrosio / Nicholas Ambrosio vs Nicolas Stansbury / Solomon Daud6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJoshua Kim / Alder Gonzalez vs David Luong / Matt Jester6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEli Alejo / Ismael Soria vs Yim Tse / Jefferson Law6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
EDWARD CHOI
published 5
4.38
Daniel Soto
published 4.5
4.38
Jonathan Figueira
published
4.26
Eli Alejo
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.20
Khoa Do
published
3.99
Nicholas Ambrosio
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.89
Simon Ketema
published
3.88
Anthony Hean
published 4
3.68
Ismael Soria
published 4
Joshua Kim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Joshua Tesoro
published
Mathew Gonzales
published
Zachary Ambrosio
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
EDWARD CHOI
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
4.56
4.5
Daniel Soto
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
Jonathan Figueira
90W–54L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
4.38
4.5
Eli Alejo
97W–73L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.26
Khoa Do
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Nicholas Ambrosio
90W–53L career · 6 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.99
Simon Ketema
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Anthony Hean
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Ismael Soria
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Joshua Kim
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joshua Tesoro
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mathew Gonzales
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Zachary Ambrosio
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.