Teams

LANEY TA/ALAMEDA HS 18AW3.0A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Anna Bowe
published 3
2.87
Olga Sokolov
published
2.84
Penny Lane
published
2.75
Cynthia Lim
published 3
2.73
Shiow-Rong Lin
published
2.69
Diane Simpson
published 3
2.67
Cora Luber
published 3
2.61
LyLy Kim
published
2.59
Laila Grassley
published
2.58
Amy Watson
published 3
2.54
Katherine Greenberg
published
2.48
Olivia Mattox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Olivia Mattox + Katherine Greenberg134 matchesnot enough data
Anna Bowe + Penny Lane404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anna Bowe
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
Olga Sokolov
28W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
Penny Lane
21W–14L career · no lines in 2022
0%<1%>99%
2.84
3
Cynthia Lim
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.75
Shiow-Rong Lin
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
0%4%96%
2.73
3
Diane Simpson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Cora Luber
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
LyLy Kim
24W–24L career · no lines in 2022
0%20%80%
2.61
Laila Grassley
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
0%25%75%
2.59
3
Amy Watson
23W–36L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
Katherine Greenberg
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
Olivia Mattox
14W–22L career · no lines in 2022
0%58%42%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.