Teams

KFoster (WSRC)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-04vs ABvanMeter (Southampton)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMarie Yaconetti / Yvette Gama vs Diane Ward / Janice Daniel3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLynette Hague / Lori van Blarcom vs Katherine Fulcomer / Kara Moore3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesIveth Major / Julie Smallwood vs Kim Rivera / Karen Watford4-6, 4-6
2026-08-28vs KTreece/EBass (Sardis)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLydia Schoeck / Lori van Blarcom vs Katie Crosby / Emily Bass3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLynette Hague / Sharon Cranford vs Tracy Thomas / Erin Zelickson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNicole Rizzieri / Iveth Major vs Erica Adcock / Chanler Krupa0-6, 0-6
2026-08-21vs JCook/Weaver (PCC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Foster / Iveth Major vs Melissa Weaver / Whitney Vineyard2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Smallwood / Lydia Schoeck vs Jennie Cook / Kathleen Valentine7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLynette Hague / Lori van Blarcom vs Kathleen Carpenter / Nancy Stenersen3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-08-14vs ASchaaf (Charlotte CC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMarie Yaconetti / Lori van Blarcom vs Laura Judd / Caroline Winslett3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSharon Cranford / Karen Foster vs Christen Scott / Parmele Calame6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDorothy Senay / Julie Smallwood vs Amy Schaaf / Brandon Boyd1-6, 0-2
2026-08-07vs DWhitmore (Carmel)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMarie Yaconetti / Lori van Blarcom vs Jennifer Miralia / Jane Bolt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYvette Gama / Iveth Major vs Hollie Mosack / Paris Loesch1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNicole Rizzieri / Karen Foster vs Amy Elaasar / Robyn Hoppe6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Marie Yaconetti
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Lynette Hague
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Lydia Schoeck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Sharon Cranford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Diana Gasparro
published 3.5
3.37
Yvette Gama
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Lori van Blarcom
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Dorothy Senay
published
3.22
Julie Smallwood
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Iveth Major
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.01
Nicole Rizzieri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori van Blarcom + Lynette Hague4948% games+11.2% vs expected
Sharon Cranford + Lori van Blarcom81047% games+9.1% vs expected
Sharon Cranford + Yvette Gama7358% games−1.1% vs expected
Lori van Blarcom + Yvette Gama7550% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Cranford + Lynette Hague5452% gamesnot enough data
Lynette Hague + Yvette Gama5260% gamesnot enough data
Lori van Blarcom + Marie Yaconetti2445% gamesnot enough data
Yvette Gama + Marie Yaconetti2448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marie Yaconetti
38W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
Lynette Hague
62W–56L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Lydia Schoeck
103W–69L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Sharon Cranford
79W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Diana Gasparro
63W–59L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Yvette Gama
166W–126L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Lori van Blarcom
74W–85L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Dorothy Senay
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Julie Smallwood
11W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Iveth Major
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
Nicole Rizzieri
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.