Teams

Rockdale TC (Stephanie Willocks)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Business Women · 3.5 Women (Elena Cosper)

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-12-19vs Sugar Creek (Dianna Kelly)*Lost 13
L#1 DoublesPhibbie Johnson / Stephanie Willocks vs Tracee Williams / Jeannine Pelham-Young4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAdriane Ivey vs Stephanie Felton1-6, 6-3, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Stewart / Debra Ward vs Dianna Kelly / Phenette Pugh3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesIcilma Morton / Vicki Johnson vs Tammie Harrison / Karen Morris4-6, 6-3, 6-0
2021-11-13vs USTA Atlanta/Preethi RosslowLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhibbie Johnson / Chelsea Miller vs Paula Larkin / Phenette Pugh3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie Johnson / Stephanie Willocks vs LaTanya Davis / Tanja Mletzko0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women (Elena Cosper) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Adriane Ivey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Icilma Morton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Dana Harvey
published 3.5
3.17
Jacqueline Jackson
published
2.93
Chelsea Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Debbie Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Stephanie Willocks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Melanie Johnson
published
Susan Norton
published
Vicki Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adriane Ivey + Dana Harvey7451% games+1.9% vs expected
Debbie Stewart + Jacqueline Jackson123 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Stewart + Icilma Morton123 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Stewart + Chelsea Miller123 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Jackson + Icilma Morton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adriane Ivey
64W–30L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
Icilma Morton
48W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.52
3.5
Dana Harvey
60W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Jacqueline Jackson
17W–19L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3
Chelsea Miller
25W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Debbie Stewart
21W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Stephanie Willocks
8W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
2.60
Melanie Johnson
38W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Norton
26W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vicki Johnson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.