Teams

All About that Ace

2023 Shenandoah Singles Fall Weekend · Shenandoah 2.5 WEEKEND FALL Singles Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.92 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-21vs Rally Cats 2.5SLost 01
L#1 SinglesKim Hovda vs Linda Dinga4-6, 2-6
2023-10-15vs Rally Cats 2.5SLost 01
L#2 SinglesJoi Ruther vs Linda Dinga2-6, 1-6
2023-10-07vs Rally Cats 2.5SLost 01
L#2 SinglesCarly Schrager vs Sarah Midgley3-6, 0-6
2023-09-30vs Rally Cats 2.5SWon 10
W#1 SinglesJoi Ruther vs Ingrid Hunsicker7-5, 4-5
2023-09-23vs Rally Cats 2.5SWon 21
L#1 SinglesJacy Everling vs Linda Dinga4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKim Hovda vs Susan Metcalfe6-2, 7-6
W#3 SinglesCarly Schrager vs Jane Kim6-2, 6-1
2023-09-16Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJoi Ruther vs Erin Clark3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-09vs Rally Cats 2.5SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesChandra Bittner vs Sarah Midgley6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJacy Everling vs Ingrid Hunsicker4-6, 3-6
2023-08-26vs Rally Cats 2.5SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesChandra Bittner vs Ingrid Hunsicker6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJoi Ruther vs Erin Clark4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah 2.5 WEEKEND FALL Singles Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Chandra Bittner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Kim Hovda
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.77
Carly Schrager
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.53
Jacy Everling
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.46
Janet Bailey
published
2.30
Frankie Smith
published 2.5
2.25
Joi Ruther
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.02
Liliana Michaels
published
Jian Wen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carly Schrager + Jacy Everling0633% gamesnot enough data
Joi Ruther + Chandra Bittner404 matchesnot enough data
Kim Hovda + Chandra Bittner314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chandra Bittner
112W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Kim Hovda
155W–110L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.19
3
Carly Schrager
67W–72L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Jacy Everling
44W–87L career · 2 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.53
Janet Bailey
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%63%37%
2.46
2.5
Frankie Smith
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Joi Ruther
94W–122L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
Liliana Michaels
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Jian Wen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.