Teams

DeGioia

2021 Frederick County Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-04-15vs ReefeWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca DeGioia / Megan Wilhelm vs Teresa Reefe / Monica DeAgostino6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2021-04-11vs ReefeWon 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca DeGioia / Megan Wilhelm vs Melissa Barry / Lesley Leonard7-5, 6-4
2021-04-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesJodi Hathaway vs Malissa Hudson6-3, 6-4
2021-04-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBronwen Williams / Jessica Berkline vs Robin Dickerson / Julie Baker3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2021-03-30vs ReefeLost 12
L#1 DoublesHilary Broder / Rebecca DeGioia vs Donna Jones / Kathy Greene7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBronwen Williams / Dominique Davis vs Lesley Leonard / Cathy Cunningham3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Berkline / Jodi Hathaway vs Monica DeAgostino / Veronica Best4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-03-24vs DickersonWon 10
W#1 SinglesJodi Hathaway vs Shaunte Taswell6-3, 6-0
2021-03-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBronwen Williams / Beth Young vs Julie Zaldumbide / Veronica Best6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2021-03-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Berkline / Bronwen Williams vs Robin Dickerson / Lindsey Biber7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesJodi Hathaway / Erika Gilbert vs Melanie Mulligan / STACEY WOLFE6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2021-03-08Split 11
W#1 SinglesJodi Hathaway vs Christina Widener6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca DeGioia / Stacey Donaldson vs Robin Dickerson / Janann Mercker6-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Jodi Hathaway
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.03
Hilary Broder
published 3.5
3.00
Rebecca DeGioia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Jennifer Willie
published
Christie Gray
published 3
2.73
Bronwen Williams
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Erika Gilbert
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca DeGioia + Jodi Hathaway7454% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Willie + Rebecca DeGioia224 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca DeGioia + Hilary Broder134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jodi Hathaway
187W–146L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.84
3.5
Hilary Broder
4W–14L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Rebecca DeGioia
124W–169L career · 4 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.00
Jennifer Willie
28W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Christie Gray
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Bronwen Williams
109W–99L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Erika Gilbert
3W–9L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.