Teams

Warner (Golden Eagle)

2023 Leon Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W Adult 18 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesStacy Chick / Michelle Eubanks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-22vs Leon/Morgan-Gates/18&Over4.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Julie Connell vs Pia Lehtonen / Cathy Kendall6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-15vs Kjellerup (Golden Eagle)Won 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Melissa Jaacks6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Stacy Chick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-06vs Kjellerup (Golden Eagle)Split 11
W#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Melissa Jaacks6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStacy Chick / Michelle Eubanks vs Lori Elliott / Jennifer Kjellerup6-7, 4-6
2023-06-01vs Leon/Morgan-Gates/18&Over4.0WSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Chisa Kamoi7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKara Reister / Stacy Chick vs Jane Swingler / Jennifer Winegardner4-6, 6-7
2023-05-11vs Leon/Morgan-Gates/18&Over4.0WSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Melissa Powell6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Eubanks / Stacy Chick vs Jane Swingler / Jennifer Winegardner2-6, 5-7
2023-05-06vs Kjellerup (Golden Eagle)Won 20
W#1 SinglesJennifer Britt vs Melissa Jaacks6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Jones / Michelle Eubanks vs Jennifer Kjellerup / Sherry Cady7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Jennifer Britt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.69
Lisa Graganella
published
3.66
Michelle Eubanks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.63
Stacy Chick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Lisa Franson
published
3.58
Amy Otis
published 4
3.33
Anna Jones
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Chick + Michelle Eubanks432852% games−6.2% vs expected
Jennifer Britt + Michelle Eubanks303 matchesnot enough data
Anna Jones + Lisa Graganella303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Britt
111W–44L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Lisa Graganella
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Michelle Eubanks
157W–99L career · 6 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Stacy Chick
59W–50L career · 5 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
Lisa Franson
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.60
4
Amy Otis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Anna Jones
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.