Teams

3-KMcWhorter-HVCC

2024 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-25vs 2-KEller-ENOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnne Confer vs Laurie Straube5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Sarah Franks7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-18vs 7-KGreen-ENOLost 12
L#1 SinglesAnne Confer vs Ellen Libby3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Taiqin Huang6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Jeannette Brown6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-11vs 1-NDolan-HRSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnne Confer vs Rhiannon Ludington3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Nicole Dolan3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-11-04vs 5-AJohnston-DFCWon 30
W#1 SinglesAnne Confer vs Diane Allen6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Meta Kuehn6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Susana Harvey7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2024-10-28vs 6-KTravis-EVLost 12
L#1 SinglesKim McWhorter vs Amber Oberle3-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Joyce Robinson0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Tracey Maurer6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-10-14vs 4-LBible-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Ekaterina Seregina0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAna Goodwin vs Annika Kruse1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Kim McWhorter
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Ana Goodwin
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #3 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.43
Anne Confer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Cecily Peterson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.03
Deborah Hertzog
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim McWhorter + Ana Goodwin6072% games+18.9% vs expected
Kim McWhorter + Anne Confer5356% games+7.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kim McWhorter
223W–79L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Ana Goodwin
62W–42L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Anne Confer
42W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3
Cecily Peterson
207W–207L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Deborah Hertzog
24W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.