Teams

Midtown - Ettedgui

2022 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesEnrique Guzman Barron Escobedo / Tulio Sulbaran vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-31Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEnrique Guzman Barron Escobedo / ORHAN DUZ vs Matt Olender / CHRISTIAN ORELLANA1-6, 5-7
2022-05-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesEnrique Bonifaz / Adrian Perez vs Douglas Kerl / Jay Pollack5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2022-05-17vs Wtc - Juan GonzalezWon 10
W#3 DoublesEnrique Bonifaz / Adrian Perez vs Gianfranco Bacigalupo / Alejandro Gonzalez6-2, 6-3
2022-04-26vs Jetc - FlavellLost 01
L#3 DoublesTulio Sulbaran / Enrique Bonifaz vs George Flavell / Paul Muldoon5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Chase Grainger
published 4.5
3.90
John Jimenez
published
3.90
Javier Gomez
published
3.89
Robert Gregory
published
3.87
Todd Schwartz
published
3.87
Enrique Bonifaz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Juan Pablo Rincon
published
3.74
ORHAN DUZ
published
3.74
Roberto Ribas
published
3.71
Felipe Soto
published 4
3.67
Alberto Ettedgui
published 4
3.64
Adrian Perez
published 4
3.36
Enrique Guzman Barron Escobedo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Jimenez + Todd Schwartz10167% games+10.4% vs expected
Alberto Ettedgui + Enrique Bonifaz3347% games−3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chase Grainger
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
4.37
John Jimenez
15W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Javier Gomez
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
3.90
Robert Gregory
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Todd Schwartz
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Enrique Bonifaz
144W–73L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
Juan Pablo Rincon
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
ORHAN DUZ
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Roberto Ribas
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Felipe Soto
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Alberto Ettedgui
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Adrian Perez
7W–18L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Enrique Guzman Barron Escobedo
100W–187L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.