Teams

M & M's

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 55 & Over Day · Adult 55 & Over Day Women 6.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.10 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-09-12vs TerminettersLost 01
L#1 DoublesArianne Monroe / Linda Morris vs Kathleen Stevens / Renee Plazak6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2021-08-18vs Golden SetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeslie MacFarlane / Susan Houck vs Katherine Battista / Michele Brill1-6, 3-6
2021-08-07vs Golden SetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesSara Canova / Rosemary Harty vs Julia Wolf / Tammy Turner2-6, 1-6
2021-08-03vs TerminettersLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Golden / Susan Houck vs Kathleen Stevens / Diane Ruggiero0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-07-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Houck / Giovannina Dipietro vs Julia Wolf / Sharon Boswell5-7, 5-5
2021-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesPatricia Lopez / Linda Morris vs Nancy Brown / Kathleen Stevens6-3, 7-5
2021-07-05vs Golden SetsLost 02
L#2 DoublesArianne Monroe / Linda Morris vs Deborah Wright / Sheri Mazurkevich6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Houck / Barbara Kaufman vs Sharon Boswell / Beverly Graham6-1, 4-5
2021-06-28vs TerminettersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGiovannina Dipietro / Linda Morris vs Michele Barron / Lisa Greenlee6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Houck / Janet Schlueter vs Nancy Brown / Jennifer Schied3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-06-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRosemary Harty / Sara Canova vs Deborah Wright / Michele Brill4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over Day Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Linda Morris
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.68
Rosemary Harty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
2.63
Leslie MacFarlane
published
2.62
Arianne Monroe
published 3
2.62
Susan Houck
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.54
Patricia Lopez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Morris + Susan Houck404 matchesnot enough data
Rosemary Harty + Susan Houck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Linda Morris
104W–87L career · 4 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Rosemary Harty
68W–73L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Giovannina Dipietro
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
Leslie MacFarlane
10W–19L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Arianne Monroe
6W–9L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.62
3
Susan Houck
60W–77L career · 5 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
2.62
Patricia Lopez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.