Teams

CDTA W 18&OM3.5 4.Oak Lawn Noamany Sat 6 $20

CDTA 2Winter 18 & Over W · E

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesPatrick Gayatin / Raynard Laylo vs Ming Gao / Segundo Auqui2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesPiotr Lojko vs Arkadiusz Bryja4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMiguel Segovia / Jeffrey Servita vs Jeremy Bradford / RICO de LARA6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesJim Rabchuk / Raynard Laylo vs Joey Zhou / Murugan Poornachandr0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesPiotr Lojko vs Zhijiong Lin6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAbhisek Gupta / Alvin Bulaon vs Yusuke Saito / Kenta Oikawa3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCharles Karczewski / Luis Gonzalez vs DOMINIC KIRSCHBAUM / Tom Kastner4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-03Lost 12
W#1 SinglesPiotr Lojko vs Nikhil Gaur7-6, 4-5
L#2 SinglesAlvin Bulaon vs Michael Liu2-6, 5-2
L#3 DoublesCharles Karczewski / Luis Gonzalez vs Michael Chan / Charles Stone6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesLuis Gonzalez / Raynard Laylo vs Cezar Camba / Kiwon Nam1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlvin Bulaon vs Peidi Wu6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHilario Salgado / Michael House vs Sean Conboy / Louis Skarosi2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPatrick Gayatin / Jeffrey Servita vs Keith Mills / Ron Netzel6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAlvin Bulaon / Jim Rabchuk vs MARK CUSHING / Mark Spinazze5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatrick Gayatin / Jeffrey Servita vs Mario Ahuad / Juan Ponce1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlvin Bulaon / Jim Rabchuk vs Ed Duffy / James Albertone7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Servita / Patrick Gayatin vs Vytas Kasniunas / Mike Lyman4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlvin Bulaon vs Brent Sevcik6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLuis Gonzalez / Charles Karczewski vs Howard Gartzman / Isaac Gartzman1-6, 2-6
2024-01-20vs CDTA A18&O 3.5M Heritage RustagiLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlvin Bulaon vs Vishal Dhar3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJim Rabchuk / Raynard Laylo vs Manoranjan Mohanty / Venkat Maligireddy5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA A18&O 3.5M Heritage Rustagi72311429321
2CDTA W 18&OM3.5 7.River Trails Ciuca Sat 6 $2572291637314
3CDTA W 18&OM3.5 3.Centennial Anderson Sat 5 $2072301538368
4CDTA W 18&OM3.5 5.Tam Rykhus Sun 11 $2254252047390
5CDTA W 18&OM3.5 2.MT Chi Brown Sun 12 $3045232252401
6CDTA W 18&OM3.5 4.Oak Lawn Noamany Sat 6 $2045212454387
7CDTA W 18&OM3.5 1.Schaumburg Zhou Sat 10 $2045202556412
8CDTA W 18&OM3.5 9.Wheaton Mills Sat 4 $2036172862439
9CDTA W 18&OM3.5 6.Centennial Lado Sat 1 $2027172860416
10CDTA W 18&OM3.5 10.MT Pal Korczak Sun 1 $2527123371479

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jeffrey Servita
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Charles Karczewski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Piotr Lojko
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.26
Alvin Bulaon
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.21
Ahmed Noamany Ali
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Raynard Laylo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Hilario Salgado
published 3
2.86
Patrick Gayatin
published 3
2.52
Ricardo Oliva
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Jim Rabchuk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Michael House
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Miguel Segovia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Gayatin + Jeffrey Servita3643% games+6.3% vs expected
Raynard Laylo + Patrick Gayatin301553% games+0.5% vs expected
Ahmed Noamany Ali + Patrick Gayatin21233% games−3.7% vs expected
Jim Rabchuk + Patrick Gayatin1635% games−6.1% vs expected
Jim Rabchuk + Raynard Laylo0534% games−9.9% vs expected
Raynard Laylo + Hilario Salgado6078% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Gayatin + Ricardo Oliva044 matchesnot enough data
Ricardo Oliva + Hilario Salgado224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Servita
37W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
3.5
Charles Karczewski
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Piotr Lojko
24W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.34
3.5
Alvin Bulaon
21W–20L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Ahmed Noamany Ali
9W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Raynard Laylo
65W–113L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.15
3
Hilario Salgado
44W–53L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Patrick Gayatin
44W–57L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.86
Ricardo Oliva
8W–21L career · 7 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
Jim Rabchuk
5W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael House
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Miguel Segovia
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.