Teams

NRRC

2026 Tri Level Men · 4.0,3.5,3.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-12vs ATC - SOT 2 JimenezSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDavid Priego / Won Choe vs Luca Tait / Bruno Cilio3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJianming Kang / Paul Ercolano vs Charles Sears / Divesh Mehta6-3, 6-3
2026-03-22vs TCH:Trilogies26Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHarry Kim / Anbo Zhou vs Brooks Ballard / Marcio Lemos Nery2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-14vs Chestnut Ridge Team NameLost 03
L#1 DoublesDominic Thelliyankal / Adam Ashcraft vs Josh Faust / Mario Valadez Trevino6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHarald Collet / Richard Gluckselig vs Matthew Rosenberg / Adam Aizer3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTim TIambeng / Jianming Kang vs Joseph Kaiser / Nick Santucci4-6, 5-4
2026-03-08vs LIFETIME ATHLETIC TribreakersLost 12
L#1 DoublesRyan Choi / Dominic Thelliyankal vs Andrew Roth / Russ Detres2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAdam Ashcraft / Richard Gluckselig vs Jiang Qian / Glen Sansone3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHarry Kim / Anbo Zhou vs Santino Terranova / Marcello Hallake6-3, 6-4
2026-03-07vs WTC: Tri-4.0 Triple TakesLost 12
L#1 DoublesWon Choe / Irvin MacQuarrie vs Alexander Fear / Nicholas Sica6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAdam Ashcraft / Harald Collet vs Charles Knirsch / Christian Mpody5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPaul Ercolano / Tim TIambeng vs Dino Ewing / Bill O'Connor6-4, 7-6
2026-02-27vs ATC - SOT 1 JimenezSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAdam Ashcraft / Won Choe vs Max Borchert / Nathan Kerxhalli6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAnbo Zhou / Harry Kim vs Jong Cha / Christopher Wood6-1, 7-5
2026-02-01vs Sportime Lake IsleWon 10
W#3 DoublesHarry Kim / Anbo Zhou vs Alan Sexton / STEFAN ANDREEV6-1, 6-3
2026-01-11vs TCH:Trilogies26Won 21
L#1 DoublesVinu Potti / Irvin MacQuarrie vs Steven Aveni / Anish Desai0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesHarald Collet / Ray Martinelli vs Faustino Bernabo / Dexter Haye7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJianming Kang / Tim TIambeng vs Anthony Patterson / Marcio Lemos Nery6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Joseph Brasile
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Irvin MacQuarrie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Dominic Thelliyankal
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.45
Ryan Choi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Ray Martinelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
David Priego
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Richard Gluckselig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Harald Collet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Adam Ashcraft
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Aristide D'Arienzo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Zeeshan Memon
published
3.08
Harry Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Won Choe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Jianming Kang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Anbo Zhou
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Tim TIambeng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Paul Ercolano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vinu Potti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aristide D'Arienzo + Dominic Thelliyankal5353% games+6.6% vs expected
Richard Gluckselig + Aristide D'Arienzo1443% games−0.7% vs expected
Richard Gluckselig + Tim TIambeng3249% gamesnot enough data
Irvin MacQuarrie + Dominic Thelliyankal044 matchesnot enough data
Richard Gluckselig + Dominic Thelliyankal314 matchesnot enough data
David Priego + Dominic Thelliyankal314 matchesnot enough data
Harry Kim + Anbo Zhou314 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Brasile + Richard Gluckselig123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Brasile
48W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Irvin MacQuarrie
86W–146L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
Dominic Thelliyankal
35W–28L career · 8 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Ryan Choi
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Ray Martinelli
72W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
David Priego
23W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.41
Richard Gluckselig
42W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Harald Collet
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Adam Ashcraft
20W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Aristide D'Arienzo
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.12
Zeeshan Memon
15W–4L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Harry Kim
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Won Choe
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Jianming Kang
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Anbo Zhou
7W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Tim TIambeng
19W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Paul Ercolano
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Vinu Potti
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.