Teams

TCSP-Double Mints-Steck

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-22vs RBW-Group Therapy-FerlemanWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarrie Morris / Emily Apfel vs Ozzy English / Joanne Yu3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesWendy Champagne vs Laurie Wilkins6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristine Henn / Margaret Steck vs Janet Milam / Debara Ferleman1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-14vs BC-Doubles or Nothing-ArjalWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Champagne / Geeta McCormack vs Genevieve Arjal / Brooke Stabbert6-3, 6-5
W#1 SinglesCarrie Morris vs Tracy Missad6-7, 2-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Steck / Kristin Zwiers vs Lisa Mohanty / Michelle Chattin6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-07vs MI-KoderaLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Mahony / Katie Pitt vs Laura Althoff / Jennifer Rosenwald4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesWendy Champagne vs Carin Parcel6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTara Nelson / Kristin Zwiers vs Annie Pearse / Samantha Condiotty1-6, 5-7
2021-05-31vs TCSP-40/Love-CamposLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Mahony / Emily Apfel vs Jillayna Campos / Priscilla Cypiot0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSuzie Heid vs Annabella Chiocco3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Champagne / Christine Henn vs Shelley Buckholtz / Laurie Daiger6-4, 6-6
2021-05-24vs TCSP-40/Love-CamposLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Henn / Tara Nelson vs Laura Young / Aniki Olson2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErika Johnson / Geeta McCormack vs Valerie Dillard / Priscilla Cypiot1-6, 2-6
2021-05-17vs RBW-Group Therapy-FerlemanWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarrie Morris / Wendy Champagne vs Laurie Wilkins / Debara Ferleman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristine Henn vs Kiera Kim1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Apfel / Annie Hartsock vs Rebecca Buxbaum / Julia Boneva7-5, 3-4
2021-04-26vs BC-Doubles or Nothing-ArjalWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Henn / Emily Apfel vs Genevieve Arjal / Brooke Stabbert7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Zwiers / Margaret Steck vs Jen Waldher / Michelle Chattin7-5, 3-2
2021-04-19vs MI-KoderaLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzie Heid / Geeta McCormack vs Annie Pearse / Bridget Schauer4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristine Henn vs Carin Parcel6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargaret Steck / Erin Mahony vs Motoko Kodera / Teri Pollastro4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCSP-Volley Girls-Thorne7117718165
2BAIN-Carrillo6015310113
3STC-Buhler6217716180
4AYTC (OUTDOORS) Sets in the City-McKay4211714136
5ETC-Holle44131127213
6MI-Kodera44111328223
7TCSP-Double Mints-Steck44131129240
8BC-Doubles or Nothing-Arjal44111329225
9FC-Basha Tennis-Lydon3381022171
10WSC-Raquettes-Onu3371124185
11PL-Porter35111327213
12BC-Freudenberger35101427214
13ETC-Slicetinis-Tang2481023179
14RBW-Group Therapy-Ferleman1771730219
15CAC/SL-Matter1742040249
16ETC-Racq Pack-Brown0621632206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Emily Apfel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Christine Henn
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Wendy Champagne
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.65
Geeta McCormack
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Margaret Steck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Katie Pitt
published 3
2.51
Carrie Morris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.50
Suzie Heid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Annie Hartsock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Erin Mahony
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tara Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Henn + Carrie Morris7454% games+4.2% vs expected
Christine Henn + Wendy Champagne112144% games+0.8% vs expected
Tara Nelson + Christine Henn2639% games+0.4% vs expected
Wendy Champagne + Carrie Morris3343% games−1.2% vs expected
Margaret Steck + Christine Henn1835% games−3.2% vs expected
Geeta McCormack + Carrie Morris2537% games−7.8% vs expected
Erin Mahony + Margaret Steck2440% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Steck + Geeta McCormack1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Emily Apfel
53W–47L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Christine Henn
41W–85L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Wendy Champagne
40W–71L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Geeta McCormack
35W–85L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Margaret Steck
27W–67L career · 4 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Katie Pitt
19W–39L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Carrie Morris
53W–73L career · 3 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Suzie Heid
41W–51L career · 2 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
2.50
Annie Hartsock
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Erin Mahony
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tara Nelson
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.