Teams

Covington - PCC

2024 Escambia Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-24vs Escambia/Patterson/50&Over6.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesOliva Smith / Kathy Ross vs Jennifer Johnson / Tanya Hughes6-2, 7-5
2024-11-17vs Escambia/Patterson/50&Over6.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesOliva Smith / Debra Gregory vs Jacqueline Wallace / Sharon Powell0-6, 2-6
2024-11-12vs Escambia/Patterson/50&Over6.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathy Ross / Oliva Smith vs Tanya Hughes / Sharon Powell2-6, 2-6
2024-11-03vs Escambia/Patterson/50&Over6.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesDebra Gregory / Oliva Smith vs Megan Frederick / Jacqueline Wallace2-6, 0-6
2024-10-27vs Escambia/Patterson/50&Over6.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Gonzalez / Penelope Bradley vs Jeannette Fabbro / Tonya Chase4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Prindiville / Elizabeth Locklear vs Michelle Patterson / Bonnie Bucco6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLibby Covington / Nena Haigler vs Tanya Hughes / Jennifer Johnson2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Denise Prindiville
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Jill Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Sandra Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Sally Bergosh
published
3.02
Oliva Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Kathy Ross
published
2.85
Libby Covington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Debra Gregory
published 3
Elizabeth Locklear
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nena Haigler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Penelope Bradley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Prindiville
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.57
Jill Gonzalez
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
1%87%13%
3.34
Sandra Wilson
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Sally Bergosh
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Oliva Smith
15W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Kathy Ross
24W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Libby Covington
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Debra Gregory
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elizabeth Locklear
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Nena Haigler
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Penelope Bradley
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.