Teams

ESTC-Follett

2022 MIXED 18 & Over · 7.0 MIXED DOUBLES

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-10-10vs ACB-RickerLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Follett / John Follett vs Kathryn Sanders / Douglas Beck3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAustin Bailey / Sarah Medary vs Ann Frischkorn / David Frischkorn4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAnthony Losco / Jen Matthews vs Stephanie Strand / Andrew Mardock6-4, 6-4
2021-10-10vs ESTC-HolzLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Follett / Sarah Follett vs Travis Holz / Christina Spencer6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnthony Losco / Jen Matthews vs Jon Eschrich / Karen Klump3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBrian Whalen / Angela Whalen vs Eric Welch / Keri Pape3-6, 2-6
2021-10-09vs ESTC-BodeenLost 03
L#1 DoublesAustin Bailey / Sarah Medary vs Ronald Bodeen / Kailyn Fowler0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnthony Losco / Jen Matthews vs Edmund Yang / Karen Bodeen2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Whalen / Angela Whalen vs Henry Fowler / Charlotte Ransom3-6, 4-6
2021-10-09vs ESTC-MartesWon 21
W#1 DoublesAustin Bailey / Jen Matthews vs Thomas Jordan / Aubree Nash7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSarah Follett / John Follett vs Ajay Nair / Krissi Martes7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAngela Whalen / Brian Whalen vs Christopher Casey / Renee LaFrance4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MIXED DOUBLES have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Brian Whalen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.26
Austin Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.26
John Follett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Sarah Follett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Anthony Losco
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Angela Whalen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jen Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sarah Medary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Whalen + Angela Whalen71447% games−7.5% vs expected
Sarah Follett + John Follett9849% games−9.0% vs expected
Jen Matthews + Anthony Losco123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Whalen
21W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Austin Bailey
21W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.26
John Follett
35W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Sarah Follett
50W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Anthony Losco
40W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Angela Whalen
29W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jen Matthews
25W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Medary
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.