Teams

LAndersen/SGossert (Shannamara)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 15 6:30 PM
vs
Queens Sports Complex at Marion Diehl Park
Sep 22 6:30 PM
vs
Shannamara Swim & Tennis
Sep 29 6:30 PM
vs
Shannamara Swim & Tennis
2026-09-08vs SNester/SHarris (Windyrush)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBecky Shopf / Carolyn Henderson vs Sarah Harris / Katy Surlea2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTeri Snoke / Christine Zetts vs Robyn Riordan / Arden Smith6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLori Andersen / Bridget Franks vs Jennifer Briggs / Susan Nester3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-09-01vs MTurturro (OPRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesLori Andersen / Carolyn Henderson vs Laura Fox / Stacey Jones5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBecky Shopf / Christine Zetts vs Lisa Baker / Stacey Valitchka6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTeri Snoke / Kelly DiCristo vs Ashley Kreth / Teresa Powell6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-26vs VTolson/Petras (FCC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Andersen / Kelly DiCristo vs Courtney Slavin / Caroline Lattanzi1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesYukiko Cooper / Stephanie Gossert vs Jennifer Voci / Shalini Patel2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Henderson / Bridget Franks vs Viki Tolson / Deb Sokol3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-18vs EBass/LThompson (Sardis)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Gossert / Kelly DiCristo vs Jennifer Zarins / Naomi O'Brien1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesYukiko Cooper / ANGELA BOREK vs Heather Carter / Lauren DiLuzio6-0, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBecky Shopf / Carolyn Henderson vs Patricia Phelan / Judy Kilduff6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings44 teams · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SAliota/CBauer (Carmel)2060243
2VWade/KCollins (Jeff Adams)2051229
3SStroud/MMetzl (Sardis)2051224
4LDyer (Mountainbrook)2042548
5JWoodruff (CSRC)2042555
6LPratt/CPrejean (Lifetime)1030012
7MMcHugh (Queens)1030012
8KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)1030113
9SGrindle (WSRC)1021217
10CAckels (PCC)1021226
11KRichards (Raintree)1021220
12SNewman (BCC)1021218
13BDunn (PPRSC)1021217
14JJZhu (Park Road)1021326
15KOShea/RFitzsimons (Carmel)1021326
16EBass/LThompson (Sardis)1021323
17LDiman/Magee (Carmel)1021322
18JCarlsen (River Hills Country Club)1021427
19JHerlong/LOCallaghan (FCC)1142446
20KCox (MPCC)1142555
21SChandra (Charlotte Tennis - Sharon Lakes)1142547
22LHuntington (Park Road)1133648
23AMilas (OPRC)1133751
24KGreathouse (Russell)1124863
25BBrown (Park Crossing)1124857
26VTolson/Petras (FCC)000000
27CChilds (Blakeney)000000
28SNester/SHarris (Windyrush)000000
29AHall (Raintree)0112428
30SDurovic/Wilson (Palisades)0112430
31LAndersen/SGossert (Shannamara)0112428
32TMermans/JPetrikis (WSRC)0112425
33JFontaine/Inga (Life Time)0112535
34MTurturro (OPRC)0112537
35ACutts (WSRC)0112528
36CMcKiernan (Raintree)0103638
37THyso (Life Time)0103634
38VBorkey (Pine Lake CC)0103636
39ACheek/KBissett (Piper Glen)0103632
40VPomfrey (Rolling Hills)0224961
41DPorter/Fuller (Carmel)02151068
42CMiller (Charlotte CC)02151067
43ATrexler/LPelletier (Queens)02151072
44ASmith (OPRC)02151065

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Becky Shopf
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Stephanie Gossert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Teri Snoke
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
ANGELA BOREK
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Yukiko Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Kelly DiCristo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Christine Zetts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Carolyn Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.46
Bridget Franks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly DiCristo + Yukiko Cooper7749% games+5.7% vs expected
Becky Shopf + Teri Snoke5641% games−1.9% vs expected
Stephanie Gossert + Becky Shopf4349% games−4.6% vs expected
Stephanie Gossert + Teri Snoke14952% games−7.5% vs expected
Stephanie Gossert + Yukiko Cooper2448% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Henderson + Becky Shopf314 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Henderson + Kelly DiCristo134 matchesnot enough data
Becky Shopf + Kelly DiCristo314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becky Shopf
96W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Stephanie Gossert
132W–96L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Teri Snoke
90W–97L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
ANGELA BOREK
5W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Yukiko Cooper
28W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Kelly DiCristo
22W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Christine Zetts
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Carolyn Henderson
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
2.5
Bridget Franks
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.