Teams

DStern (OPRC)

2025 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 9.0 Men - Sat PM

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-10vs DBrantmeyer (Park Road)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNeil Handelsman / Frank Lowe vs Scott Nichols / Jon Koceja3-6, 4-6
2025-04-12vs SSwanson (Palisades)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTrip Caldwell / Daniel Comisar vs Jay Tiedeman / Scott Swanson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-05vs DBrantmeyer (Park Road)Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Stern / Daniel Comisar vs Tim Chu / John England6-0, 6-3
2025-03-22vs SSwanson (Palisades)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNeil Handelsman / Joel Turner vs Barry Bonikowski / Mark Semler6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-15Lost 01
L#3 DoublesFrank Lowe / Daniel Comisar vs Scott Nichols / Thomas Mattapallil6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-01vs SSwanson (Palisades)Won 10
W#1 DoublesNeil Handelsman / Trip Caldwell vs Thomas Forrest / Mike Boston7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 9.0 Men - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Rod Spence
published 4.5
4.31
Phil Payne
published
4.30
Neil Handelsman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Daniel Comisar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
John Deering
published
4.21
Christopher Ehmcke
published 4.5
4.13
Carl Cooke
published 4.5
4.05
Joel Turner
published
Hunt Allen
published
Oscar Cranz
published
Trip Caldwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neil Handelsman + Daniel Comisar6458% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rod Spence
103W–35L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
Phil Payne
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Neil Handelsman
58W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Daniel Comisar
90W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
John Deering
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Christopher Ehmcke
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Carl Cooke
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.13
Joel Turner
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
4.05
Hunt Allen
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Oscar Cranz
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Trip Caldwell
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.