Teams

LA/McCotter

2025 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-30vs AR/Wallman/NWALost 12
L#1 DoublesDebbie Nealy / Linda Causey vs Norma Hamm / Janice Bowen4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Adkins / Georgia McCotter vs Phyllis McCulley / Linda Wallman7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTam Nguyen / Ruth Narveson vs Billie Joslin / Marilyn Hendrix7-5, 6-0
2025-04-30vs AR/Finton/HSVWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Causey / Debbie Nealy vs Elaine Clayton / Rosemary Farrell3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGeorgia McCotter / Ruth Narveson vs Vicky Hunt / Jenny Keeton6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTam Nguyen / Philippa Mueller vs Bonnie Dorman / Paula Hibbs1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-29vs AR/Dill/CLRLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebbie Nealy / Linda Causey vs Joyce Stroud / Janie Calvert4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Adkins / Philippa Mueller vs Karen Bryant / Jane Schubert3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRuth Narveson / Georgia McCotter vs Susan Coleman / Sheila Sharp6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-29vs AR/Wood/LRWon 21
L#1 DoublesTam Nguyen / Ruth Narveson vs Linda Cassinelli / Carol Stapleton5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Nealy / Linda Causey vs Brenda Riley / Cynthia Glover7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSharon Adkins / Philippa Mueller vs Kathleen Brown / Susan Wood6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AR/Wallman/NWA40102781
2MO/Albrecht3193892
3LA/Cochran3184989
4LA/Agin’ Cajuns/Broglio31751189
5LA/McCotter226615126
6TX/Texas Blossoms/Vernor224817114
7AR/Finton/HSV134815119
8AR/Wood/LR136617125
9AR/Dill/CLR134817129
10AR-MO/Foley/Thompson/Mtn Home0421022139

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Sharon Adkins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Linda Causey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Ruth Narveson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Debbie Nealy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.40
Philippa Mueller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.29
Georgia McCotter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Nealy + Linda Causey6553% games+7.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Adkins
16W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Linda Causey
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Ruth Narveson
8W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.85
3
Debbie Nealy
8W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Philippa Mueller
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.40
3
Georgia McCotter
23W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.